Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: ">>>>> Axlrose - ... <<<<<" <axlrose@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Burned on Trade?
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 10:04:57 -0400
At 02:41 PM 7/15/98 +0100, Pedro wrote:
>Adam J wrote:
>> Also, it's considered *really* bad form to post the persons physical
>> address. If you want to let people know not to trade with someone who may
>> have changed internet addresses, list previous net.address, web page if
>> any, handles/nicks they used, and city and state. Most people get mucho
>> peeved if somebody posts their home address to any sort of forum, even if
>> it *is* justified.

>There I must disagree...if they don't want to get, and I quote, peeved if
>somebody posts their home address to any sort of forum, end quote, they
>shouldn't burn me in a trade....they burn me, I burn them....

>Don't want to start a flame here...but I had to speak about this.

>Pedro Gomes

Snipping is optional on the list lately.

I agree with you Pedro. Why protect the guilty when an innocent suffers?
That's what the United States judicial system is for...

Off-topic, I want to thank Noah Overton for offering even a minor comment
about my newest card idea. Only one that took a moment to say something.
Typical really about these things. Seems if one is not in the group,
cliche perhaps, talking about the latest fad, your comments go to the
wayside. Oh well... someone has to be the least liked individual on this
list *snicker*.

Have a few more card ideas, but seems the interest is not here.

Any comments about the apparent surge of people unloading their Shadowrun
cards and getting out of the game? And why with the list addressed to at
least 180-200 people, the group mentioned above are the only ones posting
anything? Don't others have any comments or something?

What a list.....
>>>>>Axlrose - ...<<<<<

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.