Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Tony Glinka <porthos@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Essence Loss
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 23:05:32 -0700
Jonathan Edwards wrote:

> <snip! Lots of text>
> >Perhaps I missed it and the memory fails me here, but because H-man does
> >not suffer from essence loss (according to the RPG, he's already 'dead' and
> >getting a complete body transplant), cards like Cyber Psychosis will not
> >affect him, because of the round-about wording of the cards. Having a
> >negative essence kills a runner, but the unique H-man has no ill-affects
> >from negative essence so...
> <snip! Rest of text>
>
> This is probably just quibbling on the use of words, but the way I
> interpreted the card was while Hatchetman ignores essence lost, it doesn't
> mean that he doesn't still lose it. It just exempts him from the limit of
> cyberware that is placed on him that could kill him. However, I would
> still assume taht in calculating the amount of essence lost would still
> count toward the end goal of driving him batty.

I had the same questions regarding H-2057 and his wording myself. Especially
with regards to Cyber-psychosis (CP). I ran it by the big boys at FASA and
their response was that even though he ignores essence loss CP can and does
effect him. It is included in the Q&A and I think Apone posted the response
already.

All this is well and good. It ends an argument/discussion if you accept their
answer. But you lose the great philosophical debate aspect of Cyber-psychosis
and Cybermancy.

Basically, if you are using H-2057 "properly" (i.e. load him up with cyberware),
his essence is well below zero. Somebody throws out a CP and he will get
trashed, no way out of it. Kind a real bummer if you happen to be H-2057.

Tony
--
Porthos@****.com -- GridSec: SRCard
Porthos' World of Shadowrun: http://members.home.net/porthos/sr/sr.html
Tony's SRTCG Site: http://members.home.net/porthos/srtcg/srtcg.html
Home of the SRTCG Q&A: SRCard's Official Unofficial SRTCG FAQ

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.