Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Tatsulong <tiehlong@******.COM>
Subject: Re: Burned on Trade?
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 22:51:58 -0500
Once again Keith there you go again shootin your fucking mouth off again. Same
message same old song and dance. Don't bother replying back either asshole your
lucky I didnt read this before I read the private message.

Keith R. Chenoweth wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I thought someone might like an update on this trade. I received the cards
> today from James Hash in good condition. Most of the folks who responded to
> my earlier post said they had never been burned on a trade, and I'm still
> among that number.
>
> Ironically, it was James himself that smeared his own name, as I never
> referred to him specifically in my post. So, I'm in the interesting
> position of clearing someone who attacked not only me, but himself, as well.
>
> For the record, I did mail James privately more than once, with no response,
> before I "whined" to the list. Only after I posted my message here did I
> get a reply, which was exactly the result I desired.
>
> Anyway, all's well that ends well, and all that.
>
> And James- Next time, I recommend that you read your personal mail, take
> care of your business, and pull your head out of your ass before you flame
> someone in an open forum.
>
> Keith
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tatsulong <tiehlong@******.COM>
> Date: Wednesday, July 15, 1998 10:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Burned on Trade?
>
> >Just to clarify the facts,
> >
> >keith may be referring to me. I was not able to contact several people
> since I
> >had to drop everything and leave. My situation was a family emergency
> >pertaining to my grandmother who is 95+ years old. I made a trade with
> Keith
> >and will honor all the trades I have with the others. The following list of
> >people are the ones who have not received my cards:
> >
> >keith Chenoweth
> >Luis Costa
> >Pedro Gomes
> >Ivo Petschke (wrong trade confusion on what was to be traded)
> >
> >So keith my apologies to the above people and you for not being able to
> contact
> >you in time as to my current situation. I will have all mail sent out
> tomorrow.
> >And for future keith make sure you contact the individual in question
> before
> >jumping to fucking conclusion! I hate a whiner and someone who questions my
> >integrity and then posts on the srcardlist what do I do what do I do!
> >
> >My apologies to the admin and anyone else who is offended by my words. I am
> not
> >in the mood to deal with this at this time. My grandmother is in critical
> >condition and may not make it through. So the last thing that was on mind
> was
> >the trade as well as school as well as work.
> >
> >I can only ask forgiveness and understanding in this matter. I will honor
> all
> >trades I have made with those names listed above.
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >James M. Hash (this is my real name by the way).
> >
> >PS
> >
> >Keith, next time have the guts and be man enough to confront me with the
> >problem.
> >
> >Keith R. Chenoweth wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, all.
> >>
> >> Well, after about a dozen successful trades prompted by this list, it
> looks
> >> like I may have finally gotten burned on one. This brings to mind a
> couple
> >> of questions:
> >>
> >> 1) How often does this happen to others? A rarity, or just a cost of
> >> dealing on the net?
> >>
> >> 2) What is the list policy on ratting out a bad trader? I haven't seen
> it
> >> done here, but I assume that other traders here would like to know.
> >>
> >> 3) Is there any recourse that anyone has had work to resolve this?
> We're
> >> not talking about a fortune here, but I hate losing even just 3 rares.
> >>
> >> Thanx,
> >> Keith
> >

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.