Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Tony Glinka <porthos@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Wanted
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:22:35 -0700
(Ryan Smith) wrote:

> I have a question about *Wanted*. My friend keeps insisting that he can put
> gear cards on it before i fight the runner so it benefits him. I thought
> Wanted Immeditley activates at the very begininng of the Legwork phase?

Wow, you picked a great subject here. "When does the Wanted fight actually take
place?" There has been a great deal of confusion with the Wanted card stemming
from the card text. The use of "their legwork phase" being the chief culprit.
In
fact the DLOH's have given their opinion on the matter and then they changed it.
:)

The latest ruling, while not official, is about as close to official as you can
get without being official. :) And it sort of eliminates the problem you are
having I think. (I could have misinterpreted your question.)

From the Q&A:
Wanted!:
Q1: Do you attack the Wanted! character during a) the WANTED! character's
player's legwork phase or b) the legwork phase of each opponent (Attacking
player)?
A1: The Attacking player turns his Runner to attack the Wanted! Runner during the
Attacking player's Legwork Phase, not during the Legwork phase of the Wanted!
Runner's owner. Wow! That's a mouthful!

So the idea of your opponent getting to put equipment on his runners before you
attack is now moot. During your legwork phase, you play a Wanted and then you
immediately turn a runner to go get him. Since it is not his turn your opponent
has to hope that his runner can take it as is or else he's out a runner.

I hope this helps.

Tony
--
Porthos@****.com -- GridSec: SRCard
Porthos' World of Shadowrun: http://members.home.net/porthos/sr/sr.html
Tony's SRTCG Site: http://members.home.net/porthos/srtcg/srtcg.html
Home of the SRTCG Q&A: SRCard's Official Unofficial SRTCG FAQ

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.