Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phil Jaros <chakan@****.PYROTECHNICS.COM>
Subject: Re: Two Questions
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 00:07:09 -0500
Rich Smith <Fokker9202@***.COM> wrote:
>Ok, here are two quick questions that I need some help with:
>1. Nerps. When it comes into play, the card says that it is treated as an
>exact copy of another gear card. Is the Nerps still a Special card? Can it be
>cancelled by Luck of The Irish/Lucky Wabbit's Foot?

Yes Nerps! is still a special. You can LotI it at any time, but you can
only Lucky Wabbit's Foot/Protective SPirit it when it is played.

>2. What exaclty does "just played" mean? Imagine a scenerio like this: I
make
>a run, and succeed. My opponent plays a False Mentor (a staple in any good
>deck), and I attempt to play a Luck of The Irish. The Luck fails. Can I play
>another Luck, and even another one if that one fails? And if all that stuff
>fails, still use my Wabbit's Foot to cancel the False Mentor?

You can only LotI a special once. Any LotI played after the first would
technically be being played against the LotI that was played just before it.

If you want another shot to cancel a special after your first LotI, you need
to go the Deja Vu route.

The Lucky Wabbit's Foot and Protective spirit would also only cancel the
latest Special played (ie your LotI).

BTW, there were some very interesting LotI/Deja Vu battles going on at
the Chicago Comicon this year. The tournament only had four players and
took seven hours to complete. We really shouldn't have decided to go the
multi-player first to two wins route...

All that tournament proved to me is multi-player Shadowrun TCG game drags on
far to long...


--
Phil Jaros 888888888
chakan@************.com O=O=O=O=O
___________aaaaaaaaaaaaa___________
___...aaaad8888888888888888p"""""q8888888888888888baaaa...___
``"""""q8888888888888|
|8888888888888p"""""''
``"""""< `=-~-='
>"""""''
Chakan `| ^ |'
The Forever Man / | =-= | \
/ `__.__' \

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.