Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: gencon tournament rules (official)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 07:27:03 -0700
---Gabe Rosario <Brakiss187@***.COM> wrote:
>
> Okay kids here are the rules for GenCon. Constructed deck (single and
> multi)
>
> 1. Min. 60 decks.
> 2. No proxy's

What's meant by a proxy?

> 3. English cards only.
> 4. Colored sleeves are legal
> 5. Players can cut other players cards.
> 6. When rolling to see who goes first you MAY use LOTI or DÉJÀ VU to
modify
> your roll, this means you draw your seven cards before rolling.

Interesting idea. I like it.

> 7. The player that goes first Does not draw his/her eighth card their first
> turn.
> 8. All games are to 60 rep.
> 9. Sucker runs don't count toward your 6 objectives. So if you have 4 you
> better have 6 more objectives.
> 10. If time runs out, cause there will be a time limit, the person with the
> most rep wins. In case of a tie we go to a D6 roll (which if you have LOTI
> or DÉJÀ VU you can use them) to determine the winner.

No limitations on Media Chick in this regard?

> 11. If Saeder-Krupp wins the game the player that visited last that caused
> Saeder-Krupp to win, loses the game NO matter what!!
> 12. The most important rule: THE JUDGE'S SAY IS FINAL!!!

Of course. :o)

Nothing special as far as the bullies and morph-objectives go? Guess they're
legal, just annoying.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr
SRTCG trade lists last updated 4/9/98
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.