Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: gencon tournament rules (official)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 16:12:39 -0400
At 07:27 AM 7/30/98 -0700, Loki wrote these timeless words:
>---Gabe Rosario <Brakiss187@***.COM> wrote:
>>
>> Okay kids here are the rules for GenCon. Constructed deck (single and
>> multi)
>>
>> 1. Min. 60 decks.
>> 2. No proxy's
>
>What's meant by a proxy?
>
Probably the standard Photocopied card in a sleeve or a common with LORD
TORGO written acrossed it cause someone doesn;t want their precious rare
getting beat up through play (or they don;t own it in the first place).
n with the
>> most rep wins. In case of a tie we go to a D6 roll (which if you have
LOTI
>> or DÉJÀ VU you can use them) to determine the winner.
>
>No limitations on Media Chick in this regard?
>
Man, make sure this rule is known WAY in advance so that everyone playing
has a chance to make adjustments... I'd have a stack of Even STevens and
Bounty hHUnters in my deck If I could play. I KNOW what media chick can do
in a three round, 45 minute round rournament like this...

>Nothing special as far as the bullies and morph-objectives go? Guess=
they're
>legal, just annoying.
>
THey can be dealt with fairly easily... <shrug> Annoying yes, but... :]

One question... Are the Objectives going to recycle after you go through
them? A good deck can easily cycle through 6 objectives, and despite a
common misconception, Objectives do NOT recycle normally :]

Bull
--
Bull -- The Best Ork Decker You Never Met
chaos@*****.com ===== bull22@***********.com
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/3604


========================
==========================
=======
= =
= Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any Fours? =
= =

========================
==========================
=======

"We come from Stucco Village, where we bake bread
and play tether ball all day!"
-- A really weird scene from Trinity, the 3 AM version

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.