Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Phil Jaros <chakan@****.PYROTECHNICS.COM>
Subject: Re: gencon tournament rules (official)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:50:06 -0500
>7. The player that goes first Does not draw his/her eighth card their
>> first turn.
>>
>> what is with this rule. i dont see why any one would come up with a
>> rule like this. there is nothing in the rule book that has any
>> suggestion that this is some thing that may need to be done. i dont
>> see why you should penalize the player that is going first.

In the two tournaments I have played in, we played it the with the
above ruling. However, I just went my handy dandy online rulebook
and after reading it, I cannot come up with a logical reason for it
(other then Bull's magic-holdover reasoning).

In M:TG the logic was that the upkeep/draw phase was skipped the first
1/2 turn. However, in SRTCG you take part in the first two phases
(ie Objective and Credstick Phase) but skip the Refresh Phrase.

I really don't see it as being a major disadvantage though. I think
it is well worth not drawing a card to play my Humanis Policlub Member
before my opponent gets a chance to play Stomper on his first turn...

In magic losing a card was a major disadvantage and going first was a
major advantage. In SR losing a card is a minor disadvantage (as I
think that everyone will draw up their hands to 7+1 during the course
of the game) and going first is only a minor advantage as there are only
a few useful things you can do that first turn.



--
Phil Jaros 888888888
chakan@************.com O=O=O=O=O
___________aaaaaaaaaaaaa___________
___...aaaad8888888888888888p"""""q8888888888888888baaaa...___
``"""""q8888888888888|
|8888888888888p"""""''
``"""""< `=-~-='
>"""""''
Chakan `| ^ |'
The Forever Man / | =-= | \
/ `__.__' \

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.