Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Donald Arganbright <jayden63@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Going First
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:00:34 PDT
Hoi,

>>friends and I will play, and the person who goes first stands an
>>okay chance of going against an undefend objective, that's not
>>intercepted..... how? most folks I play, don't put challenges
>>down, till they see the card, and don't get a runnuer out very
>>early... in reply to this then it is there own fualt. i believe it
>>states in the rule book. that in your hand you must have at least
>>one challenge or it is a re-deal. there for if they dont play it it
>>is there own fault.

>First, the re-deal isn't mandatory. You can opt not to play with a
>challenge in your opening hand. Second, they might not play any
>challenges in fear that the objective would be a Sucker Run.
>But even so, I agree with you - it is kinda dumb not to put any
>challenges down if you are not first.
>Another (pesudo)benefit of going first is that you don't have to
>play any challenges on your first turn. You can wait until your
>second turn and play challenges on any Objective.

I play mostly multiplayer games (90% of the time) and going first is
a monsterious advantage. It is rare that three people can put down 18
challenges before I get to go (if I was going first). I also have the
chance to get down the troll w/gear first or two cheepo runners and some
gear. No one really loads down the first guys objective because that
would leave the number two guy wide open for a free bee. So the chances
of having a second turn sucessfull run is rather large. Also in
multiplayer games going first has the added benifit of being able to see
16 cards... thats quite an advantage if your looking for a specific card
to give you that beginning of game edge.

*** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
*** - Tao ***

Jayden Stormwalker
Donald Arganbright


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.