Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "(Ryan Smith)" <SnakeIzBac@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Amerindian Contributions from Teos
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 19:34:04 EDT
In a message dated 8/2/98 12:34:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time, tabadia@**=
SENTECH.COM writes:


First off i would like to say before i comment is, that you have a lot of=
bright ideas. Here are some cards that cuaght my eye. You have so muc=
h here, it would honestly take me a long time to read. I will do my be=
st in reading them.




<< ONE OF TWO / Challenge (Amerindian/Personnel) [Uncommon]
If One of Two is defeated in combat, place One of Two in Shadowrunning
Team's safehouse. When run ends, runners returning and in the safehouse
must face the challenge. Trash the challenge after resolving any comba=
t in
the safehouse.
5/6 (A1). Damage is Armor Piercing if One of Two is in the safehouse.
Flavor: "I believe you met my brother" >>

*COMMENTS* -- This is a real original Challenge. I like this one.


<<
ORINOCO FLOW / Objective (Amerindian) / 35 REP
No Indoor or Electrical Challenges.
Shadowrunners that are not Amerindian ignore Stamina.
Requirement: Roll D6. On 4+, face Quechua War Tribe 10/12 (A2).
Any player may turn Amerindian Runners they own to modify the die roll by=
+1
or -1.

*Comments* This is a good objective--- But I will forever have a TRUMATIZ=
ING Expierance of hearing *Enya* every time i look at this objective.. =
LOL

TRIBAL SACRIFICE / Stinger / 3¥
Trash target challenge. Each Amerindian present takes D6-1 AP damage.
Flavor: "You have guns, and so have we. You have powder and lead, and so
have we. You have
men and so have we. Your men will fight
and so will ours, till the last drop of the Seminole's blood has moiste=
ned
the
dust of his hunting ground. -Osceola, Seminole, 1836>>

*COMMENTS*--- Maybe make this a *Unique* card.. or make it something like=
"trash target challenge on a 4+ or better"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.