Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Felix Hoefert <FHoefert@********.DE>
Subject: Re: SRTCG going downhill?
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 01:11:37 +0200
(Ryan Smith) wrote:
>
> In a message dated 8/10/98 6:12:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, FHoefert@**
> ONLINE.DE writes:
>
> << A fellow player told me today that one of his friends quit the game
> because there were no more Starter packs available, so he couldnīt get
> enough other people to start playing. IMHO this card shortage is a
> threat to SRTCG. Only very few are willing to start the game with
> booster packs. Iīve also discussed FASAīs alleged problems, and I do
> admit that it isnīt easy or cheap to produce a card game and expansions.
> But I hope we will be able to start recruiting players once 2nd Run is
> out. I also know that some people are too lazy to just throw their money
> together to let one among them go and get some starter packs from
> locations not close at hand.
> What were the last mentioned reliable publishment dates of 2nd Run and
> Corp Wars? There were dates mentioned of August 31 and November.
>
[snip dull, insignificant remark by ryan smith]

How else would we get the discussions going? Btw, they might be better
if You had constructive criticism. You might have a different card
availability where You live, but stores here are too unwilling to take
risks, so they ordered only small amounts of cards (5 boxes maximum at a
time). This amount is much too small to get shelve-browsers into the
game. Also, tcgs have too little of a profit range to seem interesting
to most stores, and the rest rely on M:tG customers. This also might be
a reason why FASA is probably setting priorities to RPG books/ new
editions - larger customer stock/ profit range -> more profit -> more
investment capital -> more safety in publishing new product lines.
Btw, thanks for capitalizing my name - thatīs the way it should be
remembered. ---Felix

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.