Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: New Card idea !! hee hee
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 15:47:15 -0700
---Felix Hoefert <FHoefert@********.DE> wrote:
>
> Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> >
> > At 05:16 PM 8/19/98 , you wrote:
> > >Card Name: Youse Be Playin Dat?
> > >Challenge
> > >
> > >Roll D6 When challenge is revealed.
> > >1-2: Start Talking Ebonics Immediatley, or runner team is trashed.
> > >3-4: Frag Target runner to get the new Puff Daddy Single for free.
> > >5-6: Start a pointless argument on the shadowrun card list and let it
> > carry on
> > >for days.
> > >7+: Put on a shirt, tie, and jacket, and if you don't, you can never play
> > >shadowrun again. Proper attire is needed.
> > >
> > >Picture: Seantor: Jim Jay Bulworth Dancin at a political rally.
> >
> > What trait will modify the card roll to get it to 7+? Might as well make
> > it Anti-Social
> >
> I can´t believe I´m responding to an earnest criticism of an ironic
> card, but anyway: there´s still Loaded Dice. Btw, Ryan, You truly made a
> point with this. I like it (Yo, Ah like dat. Poice). ---Felix

I agree, a point was made that needed to be. Sometimes things can be taken a
little to serious, and when the debate isn't being carried out face-to-face it
can get a little more heated than need be.

Thanx for the comic relief, JE.

-== Loki ==-
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Fearless Leader of the Shadowrun Trading Card Game Mailing List
SRCard FAQ: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/srstuff/tcgfaq1.htm
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Shadowrun RPG 3rd Edition Playtester. SRTCG Playtester.
Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.