From:	Mongoose <evamarie@**********.NET>
Subject:	Re: BM's
Date:	Sun, 11 Oct 1998 13:24:48 -0700

: If it
:did work, I'd expect a re-roll of the damage (its a separate use of the
:spell). I'd expect you would need two hellblasts, using one for each
:dealing of damage. The same would go for a rigger with wires using a
:drone, or any runner with wires using a weapon with indirect fire, I
:think.
:-----------------------------------
: I think i already adressed most of your arguments in my last post but
here
:goes some of the things i might have missed.
: Re-rolling damage? Would you re-roll a burst fire or have to repay it?

Both, I would think; you are using more bullets, no? Its not thae
sama bullets doing dmage twice, that's for sure!

:No WR
:says inflict damage (the same damage) a second time. So don't look at it
as a
:spell doing damage , just damage and ask yourself how it should be
played.
:Because if you start re-rolling for a Hellblast your gonna have to reroll
:burst fires and baseball bats and defiance tasers and don't tell me bats
and
:tasers are diffrent because there weapons not spells. They are both just
cards
:doing damage.

Since they do a random anount of damage (or have some random eefect
when used, or whatever), yes, I'd say you roll for each time they are
used, and dealing damage a second time counts as using them. I believe
sorcery limits the number of spells you can use (as opposed to carry),
does it not?
Each time you inflict damage, aren't you required to state what you
are using to do so?

Mongoose