Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Hatchet 2057
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 21:31:28 +0200
Freak Finger schrieb:
> In a message dated 10/10/98 12:33:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Olaf-Kramer@**
> ONLINE.DE writes:
>
> <<
> > But it is the same.
> > Ambidextrous says the Target Runner my use 2 (and it specifies the number)
> > pistols or H2H weapons. It doesn't say that the Target Runner may use
> > a pistol or H2H weapon in each of his/hers/it's hands.
> > If you are told you can only use 2, you can only use 2. Period.
> > Do you see the distinction?
> >
> > Sorrow
> > ---
> > I don't want to be alone | I hurt, therefore I am
> > anymore |--------------------------------
> > I don't want to be anyone | "What are you looking at...?
> > anymore | you never seen anyone try to
> > I don't need a reason to kill myself | commit suicide before?" - Anon
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If I only read the text you are right but if I add the text and the picture I
> think the card mean one weapon in each hand.But maybe I think to logical
> again(like my meaning about LotP).
>
> OLAF
> >>
> ----------------------------------
> Why would you look at the pictures? Does it say anywhere in the rules that
> you should follow the rules EXCEPT when the picture tells you not to!! And as
> for you thinking to logical...........................
> Ff

I like pictures, so why not looking to them.If I`m looking at the name of the
card(can I do this ?;) ) I think it is meaning Ican juse one gun in each Hand.
Sorry I dont understand your last part( And as ....).

OLAF

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.