Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Freak Finger <Freakfingr@***.COM>
Subject: Re: BM's
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 02:54:03 EDT
In a message dated 10/11/98 6:10:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
evamarie@**********.net writes:

<< Its only doing a random amount of damage the first time. Then you
reapply
:the damage. RE-apply meaning apply the amount already applied. If it were
two
:seperate effects you might roll twice but it is one effect. You are not
:attacking a second time so no further rolls are necessary.

Does it say "aply dmage again"- what is the exact tesxt? I don't have
that card. >>
-------------------------
Exact text is :Roll d6 after each combat user survives. On 4+ user inflicts
damage a second time.
--------------------------------
You ask each time you inflict damage your required to state what you
are
:useing. Do you think they are two seperate attacks. So the first one you
can
:use a gun and the next a katana. Or a bolt of power once and a fireball
the
:next time?

>>>> Yes, they quite reasonably should be seperate attacks, if the SR game
is any guide. I'd say using some different weapons is OK, and could be a
useful option.<<<<<<
------------------------------
Thats the point i have been trying to make. This isn't the SR RPG. Those
guidelines don't apply here.
--------------------------------
>>>> Well, if that is the meaning of the wording on "wired
reflexes", it
should be changed to "attacks again".<<<<<<<
------------------------
Yes i quite agree. If that was what they intended thats what they would have
said. They said inflicts a second time though. Until they change ti thats what
im sticking with.
--------------------
Freakfingr

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.