Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "O.Kramer" <Olaf-Kramer@********.DE>
Subject: Re: Questions about Skwraaaark
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 23:00:41 +0100
Jon Edwards schrieb:
> <snip>
> >> Not quite. The runner who is holding the bulldog van is the runner who
> >> uses the bulldog van. The text on the BV states that you can trash it
> >> to send the runners on another shadowrun. So as long as BV was deployed
> >> onto a leagel target runner (just about anyone) that runner can trash it
> >> to send a team of 4 squaaaaaarks back onto another run. The squaaaaarks
> >> are not the runner who used (trashed) the van. They just are the target
> >> of the vans effect. Which is a valid play.
> >>
>
> >This sounds not logical for me, but I have learned that I cant use logic
> if I´m
> >thinking about SRTCG.
>
> Okay, let me take a stab here....
>
> Skwaaaaaark in and of himself cannot use a Bulldog Van. However, if
> Skwaaaaaark is on a Running team with, let's say, Torgo, and Torgo has a
> Bulldog Van, Torgo USES the Van to go on another Run. Skwaaaaaark, as he's
> on the Running Team, takes advantage and goes on the next Run (as he is
> part of the Running Team.)
>
> Now, Skwaaaaark is benefitting from the Gear card, but is not actively
> USING the card. It's like this: You're not allowed to drive or use my
> Jeep. But you are allowed to ride in my Jeep when I'm driving it. Same
> kind of thing. Skwaaaaaark isn't allowed to drive or use it, but he can be
> a passenger. He just cannot be the Runner to initiate the use of the
> Bulldog Van, as he cannot hold that card.
>
> Like Donald said, it's a valid play.

Ok, I understand. I have looked from the from side on it.
But what I not understand is how you put a Skwraaaaaark in a car, even it is a
bulldog van !!! ;))

OLAF
------------------------------------------------
WE, THE HUMAN, ARE THE SKINDISEASE OF THE EARTH.
LETS HELP MOTHER EARTH, KILL ALL HUMAN.
------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.