Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Donald Arganbright <jayden63@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Pumping Media Chick?
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 13:13:14 PST
Hoi,

>>Hi, I know this has been discussed before, but I thought it was
>>errata'd or something. Two of the decks posted yesterday referred
>>to a one-run victory in conjunction with Media Chick, I assume this
>>means paying multiples of her cost before 1 run and receiving that
>>multiple of +10 rep. This is legal? It seems totally broken to >>me.
Is there a ruling from the DLOH?
>
>Before I attended the SRTCG tournament at Origins 97, I didn't know >it
wuz a pumpable card. At that point, I realized it wuz a broken >card.
Though, I usually stack a lot of Reinforcements and other >specials in
my decks I've never had to play against one. Nor, have >I ever used
one. In our games we have pretty much banned pumping >her more than
once and have banned Torgo's special ability. They >just seem
unbalanced to us. Heck, even Loki requires
>the Troll to be turned to damage him. Maybe Torgo's ability should
>only target turned Elves or something a bit more reasonable. My 8
>cents, Kev....aka Raz

My gaming circle has limited Media chick to +30 rep per turn. While
this still helps alot, it doesn't overwhelm and allow the 1 run win. (I
did notice alot more Elven Hitmen comming into play though after her
abuse came to light :)
Also with Torgo we have the house rule of 1 AP damage for every 1
nuyen... you can spend as much nuyen as you like and only have to turn
him once, and the owner can divi up the damage any way he/she chooses...
but thats 4 nuyen... 1 dead tinkerbell and 1 dead ice queen... not 4
dead elves. Its still very powerfull, but not as powerfull.


*** Knife Sharpens on Stone... Man Sharpens on Man ***
*** - Tao ***

Jayden Stormwalker
Donald Arganbright


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.