Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com
Subject: [RA:S Project] Verdict...
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
And the verdict is...

God, I can't believe this. It's a bloody TIE!!! 8 to 8.

We CAN, I suppose, give the votes of the writers more weight
(equivalent of two votes apiece), as they're the ones who'll actually
be writing it, in which case it becomes 15 to 13 in favour of 3
threads.

So what do we do, guys? Does anyone want to change their votes? Should
I go with the weighted system? Help!
==Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)

.sig Sauer
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message no. 2
From: Aaron Binns sparrow@***.net.au
Subject: [RA:S Project] Verdict...
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:58:14 +1000
Rand Ratinac wrote:

> And the verdict is...
>
> God, I can't believe this. It's a bloody TIE!!! 8 to 8.
>
> We CAN, I suppose, give the votes of the writers more weight
> (equivalent of two votes apiece), as they're the ones who'll actually
> be writing it, in which case it becomes 15 to 13 in favour of 3
> threads.
>
> So what do we do, guys? Does anyone want to change their votes? Should
> I go with the weighted system? Help!
> ==> Doc'
> (aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)
>
> .sig Sauer
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Luke, Luke, use the force Luke...

Luke Im your father.. no, actually I have no evidence to support that
claim..

Luke.. put away that lightsaber... you might hurt someone....

sorry got a star warsian bug there for a moment (if I was bill gates, Id
say it was a feature).

anyway.. i like the weighted writers concept. Not for the outcome, but for
the idea of giving more weight to the ppl who will write the epic (or so
Id like to think of it).

GreyWolf
Message no. 3
From: Rand Ratinac docwagon101@*****.com
Subject: [RA:S Project] Verdict...
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
And the verdict is...

God, I can't believe this. It's a bloody TIE!!! 8 to 8.

We CAN, I suppose, give the votes of the writers more weight
(equivalent of two votes apiece), as they're the ones who'll actually
be writing it, in which case it becomes 15 to 13 in favour of 3
threads.

So what do we do, guys? Does anyone want to change their votes? Should
I go with the weighted system? Help!
==Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)

.sig Sauer
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message no. 4
From: Aaron Binns sparrow@***.net.au
Subject: [RA:S Project] Verdict...
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 16:58:14 +1000
Rand Ratinac wrote:

> And the verdict is...
>
> God, I can't believe this. It's a bloody TIE!!! 8 to 8.
>
> We CAN, I suppose, give the votes of the writers more weight
> (equivalent of two votes apiece), as they're the ones who'll actually
> be writing it, in which case it becomes 15 to 13 in favour of 3
> threads.
>
> So what do we do, guys? Does anyone want to change their votes? Should
> I go with the weighted system? Help!
> ==> Doc'
> (aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)
>
> .sig Sauer
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Luke, Luke, use the force Luke...

Luke Im your father.. no, actually I have no evidence to support that
claim..

Luke.. put away that lightsaber... you might hurt someone....

sorry got a star warsian bug there for a moment (if I was bill gates, Id
say it was a feature).

anyway.. i like the weighted writers concept. Not for the outcome, but for
the idea of giving more weight to the ppl who will write the epic (or so
Id like to think of it).

GreyWolf

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [RA:S Project] Verdict..., you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!