Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: JAD wraith@************.com
Subject: Life is but a Dream...
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 19:58:59 -0500
...

Another whiskey and bourbon. Yeccchhh! Not even good whiskey
either. It seems I'm going to have to punish him again, think I'll
wait till he wakes up tomorrow.

Iridios
(Ok it's been some time since I wrote anything serious...)




From thatpaolo@****.com Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:37:00 -0700
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:37:00 -0700
From: That Paolo thatpaolo@****.com
Subject: [CHALLENGE] A bug's life [1/1]

"I'm the easter bug. I'm the easter bug. I'm the

*thwap*

- Paolo




From thatpaolo@****.com Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:37:54 -0700
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:37:54 -0700
From: That Paolo thatpaolo@****.com
Subject: [CHALLENGE} A Bullet's Life [1/1]

*cla-clack*

*BLAM*

".. what?.."

*splat*

- Paolo




From Pete@*******.demon.co.uk Wed, 14 Apr 1999 06:30:48 +0100
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 06:30:48 +0100
From: Pete Pete@*******.demon.co.uk
Subject: Sizes

Just a quickie, before I at least, and the "I write epics" Drea. <g> begin
posting stuff to this list (after it's written of course) Is there a limit
that is acceptable for a single post. The reason I ask is that I'm aware
that some mailers tend to translate anything aboove 25K into a text
attachment, which doesn't always get through certain mail servers. I'm
kinda used to posting 60K plus in a hit, and would appreciate a least a
little clue as to how much I need to cut for each individual mail

TIA

--
Pete






From dvixen@****.com Tue, 13 Apr 1999 22:47:09 -0700
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 22:47:09 -0700
From: Dvixen dvixen@****.com
Subject: Sizes

At 06:30 AM 14/04/99 , Pete annoyed me by writing:
>Just a quickie, before I at least, and the "I write epics" Drea. <g>
begin
>posting stuff to this list (after it's written of course) Is there

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.