Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: anders@**********.com (Anders Swenson)
Subject: 4e California (was Re: Shadowrun and Suspension of
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:46:55 -0700
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:39:17 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Tzeentch <tzeentch666@*********.net> wrote:
> From: "Graht" <graht1@*****.com>
> >I don't have a problem with an unknown faultline, or even the
> >elevation drop required to flood the central valley and LA. What I do
> >have a problem with is the conflict between that and only thousands of
> >deaths instead of millions, and the statement that San Francisco was
> >largly unnaffected when SF Bay is the only point for sea water to flow
> >through to flood the Central Valley.
> -- After so much progress had been done making the canonical wierdness more
> logical (the NAN states for example), this is just a slap in the face. And
> worst part is that it was done for NO GOOD REASON AT ALL. It's just some
> illogical wierdness they slapped in at the last moment, maybe even as an
> in-joke about how Cali gets screwed every edition.

and I'm planning to ignore it im my SR. At least the Imperial Marines left
over will be driving cabs and running bars.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about 4e California (was Re: Shadowrun and Suspension of, you may also be interested in:


These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.