Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Josh grimlakin@****.com
Subject: 50 power (Re: Questions of great importance (Steve, Jon, RA:Speople
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 19:48:03 -0500
IronRaven wrote:
> At 15.32 09-02-99 -0400, you wrote:
> >and the fact that they come out of the barrel practically on top of each
> ;|
> Are we talking about conventional MGs, or miniguns? Becuase IIRC, the M-2
> is under a thousand rounds and the M-85 is under 2000. If they were "on
> top of eachother" the pressures would blow the barrel apart and possibly
> the reciever (and that would be impressive, but not enjoyable, too see).
> >What you really need is to get a .50 cal machine gun and shoot it near a
> >watermelon. It's so much more fun when you're doing it yourself. It makes
> <Running quick mental check of inventory- M-2 HMG, negative; M-85 T-HMG,
> negative; any kind of .50-caliber, fixed case weapon, negative unless
> acquired in past 12 days>
> Even I don't have ready access to 50s- no one does. However, I have shot
> 50 cal rifles, and if what you are describing was correct, the target racks
> would have been reduced to mangled tubing or wood splinters,a nd neither of
> those happened. Just regular, clean, ordinary (except for size) holes in
> the paper. Waht you are describing would have shredded the targets into
> confetti or blown coffee cup suacer-sized holes int he target, not half
> inch ones in a relatively intact sheet of oak tag.

I know that with the larger mounted weaponry that use .50 cal rounds it
can break peoples necks by whipping their heads around if it comes into
a one foot area of the head. Perhaps the grain was differnet or
soemthing. I know nothing of weapons.


Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about 50 power (Re: Questions of great importance (Steve, Jon, RA:Speople, you may also be interested in:


These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.