Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Lady Jestyr <jestyr@*******.DIALIX.COM.AU>
Subject: A message for FasaMike
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:39:47 +1100
Glad to see you're back, BTW...

Anyway...

Please pretty please, please start thinking about the
Grounding-through-Quickenings/Grounding through Sustained Spells debate.
I can understand if you've put it in the too-hard basket for a while,
but I think you can see from the postings on the list that it's a REAL
bone of contention, and nothing's going to solve the problem but a
ruling from you. :::)

I'm sure you don't want to see the list get filled with nothing but
debates about grounding through quickened spells, so please Give [your
opinions] Generously.

[Mind you, if you say you *can* ground through quickenings I'm going to
ignore you. :) But I think the list needs the resolution - we need some
kind of official ruling.]


Lady Jestyr

-----------------------------------------------
A titanic intellect in a world full of icebergs
-----------------------------------------------
Elle Holmes jestyr@*******.dialix.com.au
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1503/
-----------------------------------------------
Remember, no matter what they say, you can
never have enough sugar. - Michael
-----------------------------------------------
Message no. 2
From: L Canthros <lobo1@****.COM>
Subject: Re: A message for FasaMike
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 22:15:18 EST
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997 10:39:47 +1100 Lady Jestyr
<jestyr@*******.DIALIX.COM.AU> writes:
>Glad to see you're back, BTW...
>
>Anyway...
>
>Please pretty please, please start thinking about the
>Grounding-through-Quickenings/Grounding through Sustained Spells
>debate.
>I can understand if you've put it in the too-hard basket for a while,
>but I think you can see from the postings on the list that it's a REAL
>bone of contention, and nothing's going to solve the problem but a
>ruling from you. :::)
>
>I'm sure you don't want to see the list get filled with nothing but
>debates about grounding through quickened spells, so please Give [your
>opinions] Generously.
>
>[Mind you, if you say you *can* ground through quickenings I'm going
>to
>ignore you. :) But I think the list needs the resolution - we need
>some
>kind of official ruling.]
>
>
>Lady Jestyr
>
Please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please,
please, give us an answer:)) We all really, really need to know to make
all of our lives full and complete:)

--
-Canthros
If any man wishes peace, canthros1@***.com
let him prepare for war. lobo1@****.com
--Roman proverb
http://members.aol.com/canthros1/
Message no. 3
From: Brett Borger <bxb121@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: A message for FasaMike
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 20:23:29 -0500
>>Please pretty please, please start thinking about the
>>Grounding-through-Quickenings/Grounding through Sustained Spells
>>debate.
>>I can understand if you've put it in the too-hard basket for a while,
>>but I think you can see from the postings on the list that it's a REAL
>>bone of contention, and nothing's going to solve the problem but a
>>ruling from you. :::)
>Please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please,
>please, give us an answer:)) We all really, really need to know to make
>all of our lives full and complete:)

Please? PLease, Please, please? Pretty Please? With a cherry on top?

-=SwiftOne=-

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about A message for FasaMike, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.