Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Ojaste,James [NCR]" <James.Ojaste@**.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: Babysitter service? ARGH! Spoiler!
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 09:36:00 -0500
Scott W wrote:
> Hee hee! We were playing Divided Assets, I think,
>
OK, this here is what we call a spoiler. Generally when you mention
something like this, you either leave out the technique/plot or you
leave out the module name. Saying "we were on a run when we did X"
is general enough not to ruin an adventure. Telling everybody what
module it was and what happened can. Please mark your spoilers in
the subject line *and* above the paragraph.

James Ojaste
Message no. 2
From: Scott W <see_scott_run@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Babysitter service? ARGH! Spoiler!
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 13:14:24 -0800
---"Ojaste,James [NCR]" <James.Ojaste@**.GC.CA> wrote:
> OK, this here is what we call a spoiler. Generally
> when you mention something like this, you either
> leave out the technique/plot or you leave out the
> module name. Saying "we were on a run when we did
> X" is general enough not to ruin an adventure.
> Telling everybody what module it was and what
> happened can. Please mark your spoilers in
> the subject line *and* above the paragraph.
> James Ojaste

Oh boy...that was very, very, dumb. I seem to have
gotten the idiotic idea that only GMs read this list.
Apologies all around, especially to anyone who's
players just came up with a miraculous strategy out of
the blue... :(
Thanks for letting me know!

Scott
==

"If you can't win, don't join them;
learn how to lose."
-Walt Kelly

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Babysitter service? ARGH! Spoiler!, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!