From: | MC23 <mc23@**********.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Combining Cyber (was: Re: Rigger 2) |
Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 1997 09:59:50 -0400 |
> That brings up an interesting idea. What percentage of the essence for a
>smartlink would be the optic hookup? Honestly, I can't see where it would
>require a direct neural hookup, just the ability to throw a targeting dot in
>your field of vision. So, why shouldn't the main hookup part of the essence
>cost be capable of being included in cybereyes as part of the "free"
essence?
>Thoughts anyone?
I've considered writing up a datajack version of a smart link. What
does everyone think is required for it to work. A datajack and a display
link would be enough of the cyber component for it to work I think.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23