Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Schweiger Manuel <brown@*****.kem.ac.at>
Subject: DunkelzahnÂīs_death
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 11:03:30 +0200
Ok chummers,

a short question:

Who do you think has assassinated Dunkelzahn ?
( If he was assassinated !!!! )

c ya. Mistik
Message no. 2
From: jhm@*****.com (J Hulley-Miller)
Subject: DunkelzahnÂīs_death
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 05:19:03 -0400
Greetings,

03 Sep 96 11:03, Schweiger Manuel <brown@*****.kem.ac.at> wrote:

>SM> Who do you think has assassinated Dunkelzahn ? ( If he was
>SM> assassinated !!!! )

My personal (and hopeful) belief is that he faked it because that was the only
way he could release a lot of information (hints==dragon version of
information) without the elven immortals getting in the way.

jhm

--
J Hulley-Miller <jhm@*****.com>
____ <fidonet#1:107/330>
\/\/ "Human nature is never so weak as in a bookstore" - Henry Ward Beecher
Message no. 3
From: bluewizard@*****.com (Steven A. Tinner)
Subject: Re: DunkelzahnÂīs_death
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 11:33:05 -0500 (EST)
> Who do you think has assassinated Dunkelzahn ?
> ( If he was assassinated !!!! )

I think he's dead alright.
I'm thinking that it was Atzlan.
The manastorm centered over the death site sounds too much like a fovae.
I don't think the IE's did it, because they would probably have been more
subtle about the situation.
Message no. 4
From: ThDMeyer@***.com
Subject: Re: DunkelzahnÂīs_death
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 16:29:23 -0400
What do you think, how likely is it that he didn't die but escaped through
the astral rift to some metaplane? I think it would be possible, especially
since the investigating mage didn't die, but went into coma. Maybe he's
trying to find a way back, like the horrors.

Thorsten.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dunkelzahn=B4s_death?=, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!