Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Mark Fender markf@******.com
Subject: Laubenstein (was: New on fasa.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:30:46 -0500
> And I don't get it either - but it sounds like there are enough people
> on the list (and thus probably amongst all SR players) who DO like his
> work for him to keep his job.
>
Okay, then. Quick poll. On a scale of 1 -10, how do you feel about
Laubenstein's art?
Here's the scale:
1 - Laubenstein should be taken out back, killed, eaten, and then puked back
up.
2 - Laubenstein. Argh!
3 - Laubenstein. Bleagh!
4 - Laubenstein. Man, his art ain't so good.
5 - Laubenstein. I don't really care.
6 - Laubenstein. Man, his art is decent.
7 - Laubenstein. I like it.
8 - Laubenstein. Step back! That's Laubenstein you're talking about!
9 - Laubenstein. I will personally kill anyone who gives him less than a 4!
10 - Laubenstein. He is unto godlike status to me. I am petitioning the Pope
for his deification.
Message no. 2
From: Schizi@***.com Schizi@***.com
Subject: Laubenstein (was: New on fasa.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:45:15 EDT
In a message dated 8/4/99 12:37:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time, markf@******.com
writes:

> 1 - Laubenstein should be taken out back, killed, eaten, and then puked back
> up.
>
my vote, though less violent of course :-)



"I'm not violent and I'll kill anyone who says otherwise"
Message no. 3
From: Twist0059@***.com Twist0059@***.com
Subject: Laubenstein (was: New on fasa.com)
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:28:05 EDT
In a message dated 8/4/99 2:11:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Schizi@***.com
writes:

> > 1 - Laubenstein should be taken out back, killed, eaten, and then puked
> back
> > up.
> >
> my vote, though less violent of course :-)


This from the great ripper in twain of fixers?



-Twist
Message no. 4
From: Jhary-a-Conel jhary-a-conel@***.de
Subject: Laubenstein (was: New on fasa.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 02:59:22 +0200
On 4 Aug 99, at 11:30, Mark Fender wrote:
> Okay, then. Quick poll. On a scale of 1 -10, how do you feel about
> Laubenstein's art?
Of course, Mark will collect the votes off-list and present them to us Real
Soo Now(tm) (I already did vote, of course :-)


Jhary
"The Trouble with life in the fast lane is that you get to the other
end in a hurry." (J.Jensen)
Message no. 5
From: Darrell L. Bowman darrell@******.dhr.state.nc.us
Subject: Laubenstein (was: New on fasa.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 00:43:45 -0400
On 4 Aug 99, at 11:30, Mark Fender wrote:

> Okay, then. Quick poll. On a scale of 1 -10, how do you feel about
> Laubenstein's art?
> Here's the scale:
> 1 - Laubenstein should be taken out back, killed, eaten, and then puked
> back up. 2 - Laubenstein. Argh! 3 - Laubenstein. Bleagh! 4 - Laubenstein.
> Man, his art ain't so good. 5 - Laubenstein. I don't really care. 6 -
> Laubenstein. Man, his art is decent. 7 - Laubenstein. I like it. 8 -
> Laubenstein. Step back! That's Laubenstein you're talking about! 9 -
> Laubenstein. I will personally kill anyone who gives him less than a 4! 10
> - Laubenstein. He is unto godlike status to me. I am petitioning the Pope
> for his deification.

Well, for all my ranting,.. I guess I'd have to go with a 4,..
maybe a 3 on yer scale :-)

---
Now will that be one thump or two?
-- Smilin' Jack, aiming his grenade launcher at the
oncoming Lone Star vehicle.


Nightshade, Human Racoon Shaman
or
Raven, Elven Irish Rigger with an attitude.

Darrell Bowman
darrell@******.dhr.state.nc.us
Message no. 6
From: Mark Fender markf@******.com
Subject: Laubenstein (was: New on fasa.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 09:19:11 -0500
> On 4 Aug 99, at 11:30, Mark Fender wrote:
> > Okay, then. Quick poll. On a scale of 1 -10, how do you feel about
> > Laubenstein's art?
> Of course, Mark will collect the votes off-list and present them to us
> Real
> Soo Now(tm) (I already did vote, of course :-)
>
Of course, what else is there to do at work?

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Laubenstein (was: New on fasa.com), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!