Message no. 1

From:	Daniel Klimmeck <laughingman@*******.DE>
Subject:	My POV, your POV(was Re: UCAS Navy)
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 1998 20:16:11 +0200

I've not followed that Threat so far, but Just one thing. If the Rules
are misinterpreted or somelike simply technically impossible, than
it is more than OK to discuss that. Don't get me wrong, this list
seems to be very free in the Threads allowed and that is what I like.
But (to came back to my point) if the History of the GAME WORLD
seem to not fit your campaign or your liking than just kick it and
fine. BTW, thats what one should do with every rule in a RPG IMO.
You just can argue all over, every time saying the same with every
party beeing in full rights to say so, but if you allways insist on
your side of the penny, than just leave it. Or just leave it after a few
tries to convince the others, of course that option is better.That
would spare some time. See, to talk about rules is one thing, you
allways have them near you to check them. Or in case of Rules
from this List or the Net per se you can go and check and then
argue from that point of view. But Game history or what might have
happend if Big D was not killed sometimes let friends depart in
anger as they can't find one level from which to operate.
Huh, sorry, didn't want to point to someone like a teacher, but I just
wanted to point it out anyway.
And no, for the future I am NOT to be quoted from this post.
;o)
--->Steadfast
To be human is not
a state of living
I want to achieve