Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Sommers <sommers@*****.UMICH.EDU>
Subject: New Fasa page
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 12:35:32 -0400
I just went to check the FASA Shadowrun page and it came back bad. So I
went to this address: http://www.fasa.com/Shadowrun/Catalog/index.html and
it came up with a completely new look! I'm starting to check it out but I
wanted to be the first on the list to say it!

Sommers
"Ah, the benefits of working on computers all day. Knew there had to be at
least one..."
Message no. 2
From: "Ojaste,James [NCR]" <James.Ojaste@**.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: New Fasa page
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:00:35 -0400
Sommers wrote:
>I just went to check the FASA Shadowrun page and it came back bad. So I
>went to this address: http://www.fasa.com/Shadowrun/Catalog/index.html and
>it came up with a completely new look! I'm starting to check it out but I
>wanted to be the first on the list to say it!

Well, the catalog didn't surprise me, but the main Shadowrun page did!
A bit more scrolling involved than I like, but decent. They could have
widened their margins a bit, too...

James Ojaste
Message no. 3
From: Lehlan Decker <DeckerL@******.COM>
Subject: Re: New Fasa page -Reply
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:08:05 -0400
<SNIP>
>Well, the catalog didn't surprise me, but the main Shadowrun
>page did!
>A bit more scrolling involved than I like, but decent. They could
>have widened their margins a bit, too...

I agree. A bit much scolling, but the artwork is very slick.
No new content :( But hopefully that will change soon.
Hopefully after SR3 they will use the web more...<hint> <hint>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehlan Decker, Unix Admin (704)331-1149
deckerl@******.com Fax 331-1159
Moore & Van Allen, PLLC Pager 1-888-608-9633

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about New Fasa page, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!