Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: William Monroe Ashe <wma6617@*******.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 1996 23:28:03 -0600
If there is a new PBEM starting, count me in. I guess I'll GM if I
absolutely have to. But I'd rather play.

regards
Bill
Message no. 2
From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 00:39:29 -0500
>If there is a new PBEM starting, count me in. I guess I'll GM if I
>absolutely have to. But I'd rather play.
>
Oh boy, you guys have no idea what you're getting into...:)

Just ask Pete Sims, or Sascha, or Andrew Halliwell, or...

Well... Good luck... I'd be in, but I definately have my hands full
elsewhere...

-Bull-the-shuddring-at-the-thought-of-dealing-with-ANOTHER-game-decker-turned-GM
Message no. 3
From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 11:47:24 +0100
William Monroe Ashe said on 23:28/ 2 Nov 96...

> If there is a new PBEM starting, count me in. I guess I'll GM if I
> absolutely have to. But I'd rather play.

I'll second that... If somebody is starting a PBEM with room for a
character (I've got a decker here that's never been used) I wouldn't mind
being in it. Although I'm not going to GM this -- I have enough experience
with PBEMs shutting down because half the players and/or the GM stopped
responding.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
The mailman visits each of us in time.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Message no. 4
From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 13:32:42 +0000
|
|>If there is a new PBEM starting, count me in. I guess I'll GM if I
|>absolutely have to. But I'd rather play.
|>
|Oh boy, you guys have no idea what you're getting into...:)
|
|Just ask Pete Sims, or Sascha, or Andrew Halliwell, or...
|
|Well... Good luck... I'd be in, but I definately have my hands full
|elsewhere...

Agreed...
I'm also involved in an ADnD PBeM, but I put my character on hold over the
summer and my hands have been too full to do much with that....

Mind you, with that,it's just characters bouncing off each other, while with
ours we have plotting to do as well....
--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| |
|Andrew Halliwell | "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!" |
|Principal subjects in:- | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!! |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | - Father Jack in "Father Ted"
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 5
From: C J Anderson <nitehawk@******.NET>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 09:28:51 -0600
Bull wrote:
>
> >If there is a new PBEM starting, count me in. I guess I'll GM if I
> >absolutely have to. But I'd rather play.
> >
> Oh boy, you guys have no idea what you're getting into...:)

Hey, count me in. I have a penchant for jumping in with my eyes closed.

Nitehawk
Message no. 6
From: "Richard 2.0" <b312@*****.COM>
Subject: new(PBEM starting)
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 10:37:48 -0500
If there's room I'm in. I've got a unused character I've been meaning to
use.
--
"Is this going to be a stand-up fight sir, or another bug hunt?"
Priv. Hudson
Message no. 7
From: Chris Black <qleap@******.NET>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 10:03:26 +0000
I wouldn't mind getting involved also. :-)

--Chris
Message no. 8
From: Hatchetman <Hatchetman@****.CZEST.PL>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 19:59:42 +0100
At 06:35 3.11.96 GMT, you wrote:
>If there is a new PBEM starting, count me in. I guess I'll GM if I
>absolutely have to. But I'd rather play.

Someone's opening PBEM ? Sign me up !
I was searching some PBEM here in Poland and on GURPSnet - no one responded.
If you know something 'bout ANY PBEM game - send me a message, please !!
I can be a GM, too but I need help to start a game - my experience in PBEM
is a very little thing.
Please respond - I need PBEM !
*********************************************************
* HATCHETMAN (a nickname from Shadowrun), *
* a poor being with only e-mail access *
* *
* E-Mail: Hatchetman@****.czest.pl *
* *
* In real world: Anonymous (a.k.a. Bednar) *
* From: Czestochowa, Poland, Europe, Earth. *
* *
* Still waiting for new mail... *
*********************************************************
Message no. 9
From: Benjamin <benjamin@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 1996 17:11:13 PST
>>If there is a new PBEM starting, count me in. I guess I'll GM if I
>>absolutely have to. But I'd rather play.
>
>Someone's opening PBEM ? Sign me up !

Me... Uhh... 4? Me Also!
Message no. 10
From: Q <Scott.E.Meyer@*******.EDU>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 16:28:01 -0600
Hey, i'm kinda new to this list, so whoever decides to start this might not
trust me that much, but i'd really like to get in on this as well. I was
involved in one for a while, but it kind of petered out for some reason or
other. I have several good characters just sitting around collecting dust,
(at least) one from every profession, so i'll be happy to fill in any gaps
there might be in the party balance. Let me know, i'll send out a list.

-Q

On Sun, 3 Nov 1996, C J Anderson wrote:

> Bull wrote:
> >
> > >If there is a new PBEM starting, count me in. I guess I'll GM if I
> > >absolutely have to. But I'd rather play.
> > >
> > Oh boy, you guys have no idea what you're getting into...:)
>
> Hey, count me in. I have a penchant for jumping in with my eyes closed.
>
> Nitehawk
>

--------------------------------
Save a tree. Eat a beaver.

Scott.E.Meyer@*******.edu
http://johnh.wheaton.edu/~smeyer
Message no. 11
From: The Crucible <crucible@******.MUR.CSU.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 09:56:44 +1100
> Hey, i'm kinda new to this list, so whoever decides to start this might not
> trust me that much, but i'd really like to get in on this as well. I was
> involved in one for a while, but it kind of petered out for some reason or
> other. I have several good characters just sitting around collecting dust,
> (at least) one from every profession, so i'll be happy to fill in any gaps
> there might be in the party balance. Let me know, i'll send out a list.
>
> -Q
>
>
> --------------------------------
> Save a tree. Eat a beaver.
>

Hey I'm fairly new here too... so I dont think -trust- means all that
much to a listserv :P... I'd love to join in... but uni finishes in a
while and I cant dial in to get mail....

(btw Save the beaver... could be a friend of the woodchuck)

Crucible

/----------------------------------------------------------------\
|email: |
| crucible@******.mur.csu.edu.au (Use this one first)|
| crucible@******.net |
| 94043950@********.mur.csu.edu.au (Student account) |
|homepage: http://itclub.mur.csu.edu.au/~crucible/ |
\----------------------------------------------------------------/
Message no. 12
From: "Mika N." <Bandit2001@***.COM>
Subject: Re: new (PBEM starting?)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 03:35:46 -0500
count me in any game

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about new (PBEM starting?), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!