Message no. 1

From:	Todd Montgomery <tmont@****.WVU.EDU>
Subject:	One more Wage Slave Post, Agrred
Date:	Mon, 12 Jul 1993 15:08:00 -0400

> From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
>
> Response to Quiktek:
>
> It's good to see that you've finally figured out what I was saying. I have
been
> talking about "wage slaves" not deckers, research scientist, and
executives.
> Out fitting wage slaves with datajacks would not be cost effective, but the
big
> guys need them.

:)

>
> I didn't mean to insunuate that wage slaves use Cyber-4's. I was just saying
> that you don't need decker equipment to be a wage slave.
>

Agreed :)

> I think you overestimate he percentage of a corporation that would need a
> datajack to perform their job. I think from 10-25% would be a better number.
>

It might really depend on the corp., and their products. Software
manufacturers would be different than Steel Manufacturers.

-- Quiktek
a.k.a. Todd Montgomery
tmont@****.wvu.edu
tmont@***.wvu.edu
un032507@*******.wvnet.edu