| From: | L Canthros <lobo1@****.COM> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [OT] Shadowrun Archive Status?? |
| Date: | Sat, 1 Mar 1997 20:08:56 EST |
<snip>
>The annoying part about this is that A) For the user, they have to
>rely on
>the page designer designing back and forward type buttons onto every
>single
>page, and even then this isn't straightforward. You can only jump to
>certain main pages, rather flip thru every page you've been to. and
>B)
>For the page maintainer, they need to key these features in, or the
>page
>(especially a large page like Paolo's) is simply to difficult to
>navigate
>thru...
>
>I really hate Frames. They're the bane of the internet, as far as I'm
>concerned...
>
>Sorry...
>
></gripe>
>
Actually, they're not so bad, if you've got a browser capable of picking
up the fact that the previous page wasn't necessarily the frames
(Netscape 3.01 works well for those of you who care:) At the very least,
people should allow non-frames navigation in a frames-enabled page, just
like providing an ALT tag in your IMG tags for those who can't see images
or don't have a fast enough modem to do so. Still, not everyone does,
cause they usually don't have those problems if they can even bother with
using the tags:) But, personally, I think frames are kinda nice, I just
wish I could figure out some way to allow the people using my page via
frames to get out of the frames when they go to an external link.
--
-Canthros
If any man wishes peace, canthros1@***.com
let him prepare for war. lobo1@****.com
--Roman proverb
http://members.aol.com/canthros1/
