Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Ereskanti@***.com Ereskanti@***.com
Subject: Questioning Affairs (Re: Decipher + FASA)
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 07:57:21 EDT
In a message dated 7/24/1999 3:24:56 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
jestyr@*********.html.com writes:

>
> One of the things I'm really worried about is whether or not they'll
> continue FASA's policy of being cool with what fans do.
>
> Are Decipher going to get their knickers in a twist about us using
> 'shadowrun.html.com' as a domain name for Deep Resonance? Are they likely
> to crack down on fans' use of copyrighted stuff left right and centre?
> (Which FASA is notoriously cool about.)
>
> That's the stuff I'm really worried about.

AdamJ, and everyone else for that matter, I am going to be adding this to my
list of "questions to ask at Gencon" this year.

For that matter, I am looking for literally *LISTS* of questions to ask FASA
staff while I'm at Gencon this year. AdamJ and I are combining our resources
(Mike B's new digital camera and Adam's new personal recorder) and try and
create the material for a "Gencon TSS" (oh yeah, sure, the material will go
to HHH also). Anyways...

IF there are any questions, please send them to ME directly if you would
(hhackerh@***.com) with the subject being "Questions at Gencon" or something
similar. I'll compile the information, and take it with me when I go. Once
I get back, I'll try and put everything back into a legible, organized,
format.

Additional question ... IS anyone who is going to Gencon this year going to
be taking, or do they possess, a Digital Camcorder? I'm just wondering...

-K

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Questioning Affairs (Re: Decipher + FASA), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.