Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Dvixen <dvixen@********.COM>
Subject: Say bye bye to the OT threads! (was Re: FASAMike)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 22:57:00 -0800
I realise that everyone is thrilled about the rumour of Mike showing up
again, but please remember why he had to leave in the first (and second)
place. Too much OT, not enough content.

Now, pratice your On Topic skills, and behave. (Yes, I know how impossible
this is, but really.)

Go read the FAQ!

-Dvixen, FAQ Flunky, seriously annoyed with her copmuter at the moment.

http://coastnet.com/~dvixen/srtcg/tcgfaq1.html
http://coastnet.com/~dvixen/shadowrun/srfaq1.html
http://coastnet.com/~dvixen/srtcg/webring.html

Enough typing.
Message no. 2
From: MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Say bye bye to the OT threads! (was Re: FASAMike)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 13:26:38 -0500
Dvixen once dared to write,

>I realise that everyone is thrilled about the rumour of Mike showing up
>again, but please remember why he had to leave in the first (and second)
>place. Too much OT, not enough content.

IIRC is was just the bulk of mail in general. I never remembered him
once complaining about OT threads. Yes, OT should be controlled but don't
use the excuse that it was the sole reason why Mike had to leave.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

"When _I_ use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful
tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less."
-Through the Looking Glass

I am MC23

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Say bye bye to the OT threads! (was Re: FASAMike), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.