Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Legion is my name-oh! <legion@**************.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: Sharper Image / Tech talk
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1993 09:39:02 MDT
I'm all for helping to come up with a Sharper Image 2054 (Cool name).
Count me in on that one.

I agree with KHANx, I'd like to see some techy talk concerning cyber
itself. I'll get the ball rolling in a post coming to a screen near
you soon!

BTW, I don't mean this as a flame to any of you guys creating new
races, but I just want to say: Please keep these races seperate from
SHADOWTK. I think I speak for the majority when I say that we would
like to keep SHADOWTK as "FASA approved" as possible, not as a
sucking up action, but as a already defined standard that all can
participate in readily and easily. The last thing we need is centaurs
and ogres taking all of the bouncer jobs. No offense to the creators
of any of those races; their design is pretty good.


_________________________________
Mike Loseke | "You were in great peril!"
legion@**************.army.mil | "Let me go back and face the peril."
Minister of Death - SWO | "No, it's too perilous!"
_________________________________|
Message no. 2
From: "Dylan Norhtup (PHY)" <norhtup@*****.CAS.USF.EDU>
Subject: Re: Sharper Image / Tech talk
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1993 12:55:19 -0400
> I'm all for helping to come up with a Sharper Image 2054 (Cool name).
> Count me in on that one.

Warning -- Idea in progress -- Warning

How about sending any tech related ideas to me and I will archive them while
Robert takes care of the more non-mundane topics. That way we won't have to
postpone conversation on tech items while working on the Tome and vice versa
when work was going to begin on the Sharper Image catalog. This way we can have
the two projects being worked on simultaneously.

> I agree with KHANx, I'd like to see some techy talk concerning cyber
> itself. I'll get the ball rolling in a post coming to a screen near
> you soon!

I believe that if you would like to discuss this there are several USENET groups
that are devouted to such topics. This kind of discussion kind of goes above
and beyond the scope of this listserv. Not to disuade you but the indepth nuts
and bolts of how a cyderarm works would be equivalent to asking what the code is
for a Shield-4 program or what kind of chips go into a Fuchi 4. A little beyond
the sope of most average Computer Science doctoral students let alone your
average listserv reader (not to say that they could not be one and the same ;) ).

****************************************************************************
* Witty Remark * Dylan Northrup <norhtup@*****.cas.usf.edu> * This space *
* Here * (Yeah I know they spelled my name wrong) * for rent *
****************************************************************************
"Bit Happens" --computer screen in T2 just before getting blown to hell

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Sharper Image / Tech talk, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!