From: | Wafflemeisters <evamarie@**********.NET> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: The talks on my Cyberware post. (munchkin humour) |
Date: | Sun, 3 May 1998 05:15:15 -0500 |
>
> At 20:55 02/05/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >> Munchkinism.. I think not, you mearly miss my point.
> >
> >Actually, I find it more Implausible than unbalancing. Both are pretty
> >plainly not cost-effective, and thus not worth developing. [No market-
> >with that availibilty, 1 in 10,000 interested people with ettiqutte 5
> >can find it, and maybe one in 10,000 has the cash. Thats 1 in
> >100,000,000, or maybe 50 in the world. Even calling it 100, where is
> >the Return on Investment?]
>
> You're looking for a World reason for something that's 100% Munchkin. Good
> luck! ;)
>
> -Adam
Um, by "not cost effective", I was making a "subtle hint"
that, even
from a PRO-MUNCHKIN viewpoint, it was kinda lame. :) But then, I'm a
min-maxer, which protects me from other strains of the "GMGMV"*.
I sold off my last cask of sarcasm enhanced napalm last week, and
haven't laid in new suplies. Can I borrow a gallon or twenty, Adam?
-Mongoose
*GMGMV- Game Master - Gamer Munchkin Virus.
Being a minmaxer is like being a ghoul- you annoy other gamers, and eat
old game books, but don't have to suck the fun out of the game to live.
I'd say the "Munchkin whiner" is like the banshee, as its wailing
instills fear and causes others to flee, and leave the rest to others to
amuse ME with....