Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Ratinac, Rand (NSW)" <RRatinac@*****.REDCROSS.ORG.AU>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 11:07:22 +1000
> Ed wrote:
> > I have a player who is wanting to know who the Organized Crime Boss
> in the
> > Seattle Downtown area is. I assume there is both Yak and Mafia in
> the
> > area? I am flipping through the Underwould Sourcebook but from the
> looks
> > of it there is no Capo right now and I see nothing about which
> family runs
> > downtown.
>
> Downtown Seattle is largely run by the Finnigan Family, headed by
> Rowena O'Malley.
>
This I did not know. Thanks for pointing that out.

> The new Don of Seattle is Maurice "The Butcher" Bigio, named by the
> Commissionne to deal with the increased Yakuza aggression in the
> 'plex.
<Steve>

WRONG! The new CAPO of Seattle is Maurice Bigio. Guys, this is the
second time I've brought this up. In the Underworld Sourcebook, you used
the term Capo to designate the Mafia headguy of a city/region, who's in
overall command of all Mafia families in the area. A Don is said to be
the ruler of a single FAMILY. Now, in Target:Smuggler's Havens and SR3
(and here, Steve) you've reversed that usage, making a Capo the head of
a family and a Don in charge of a city/region.

From what I've read, your original usage is correct - but I'm not an
expert. I would, however, really appreciate it if you'd get your act
together and find out which usage is right - and USE that one and only
that one.

*Peeved in Poughkeepsie...no, wait. I'm in Sydney, aren't I? Oh, never
mind.*

Doc'

.sig Sauer

P.S. You see that, Kama? You see the stupidity, the inanity, the sheer,
brainless genius? Now THAT'S a smartass comment. :)
Message no. 2
From: David Lightfinger <lightfinger@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!)
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 18:45:07 -0600
"Ratinac, Rand (NSW)" wrote:
>

> WRONG! The new CAPO of Seattle is Maurice Bigio. Guys, this is the
> second time I've brought this up. In the Underworld Sourcebook, you used
> the term Capo to designate the Mafia headguy of a city/region, who's in
> overall command of all Mafia families in the area. A Don is said to be
> the ruler of a single FAMILY. Now, in Target:Smuggler's Havens and SR3
> (and here, Steve) you've reversed that usage, making a Capo the head of
> a family and a Don in charge of a city/region.
>

Actually, it was the Underworld Sourcebook which is wrong. In common
police terminology concerning La Costa Nostra, a Capo is the head of a
'family', whereas the Don is the head of the Commission in a certain
city. It is Don Bigio, and Capo O'Malley. The head of all families is
the Capo di tutti Capo, the Boss of Bosses, aka the Godfather. There has
not been a Godfather since Lucky Luciano eliminated his rivals, and he
refused the title. The news media, though, gives the title to whomever
is the strongest in New York City. At the moment, this is John Gotti Jr.

I do agree with you, though. The terminology must be consistent,
otherwise we're going to end up with confusion. I also recommend Dark
Champions by Steve Long, for those who want more information about the
various types of organized crime.

--David
Message no. 3
From: "Ratinac, Rand (NSW)" <RRatinac@*****.REDCROSS.ORG.AU>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:20:08 +1000
> > WRONG! The new CAPO of Seattle is Maurice Bigio. Guys, this is the
> > second time I've brought this up. In the Underworld Sourcebook, you
> used
> > the term Capo to designate the Mafia headguy of a city/region, who's
> in
> > overall command of all Mafia families in the area. A Don is said to
> be
> > the ruler of a single FAMILY. Now, in Target:Smuggler's Havens and
> SR3
> > (and here, Steve) you've reversed that usage, making a Capo the head
> of
> > a family and a Don in charge of a city/region.
>
> Actually, it was the Underworld Sourcebook which is wrong. In common
> police terminology concerning La Costa Nostra, a Capo is the head of a
> 'family', whereas the Don is the head of the Commission in a certain
> city. It is Don Bigio, and Capo O'Malley. The head of all families is
> the Capo di tutti Capo, the Boss of Bosses, aka the Godfather. There
> has not been a Godfather since Lucky Luciano eliminated his rivals,
> and he refused the title. The news media, though, gives the title to
> whomever is the strongest in New York City. At the moment, this is
> John Gotti Jr.
>
> I do agree with you, though. The terminology must be consistent,
> otherwise we're going to end up with confusion. I also recommend Dark
> Champions by Steve Long, for those who want more information about the
> various types of organized crime.
>
> --David
>
*sigh*

You're sure about that?

Well, as my sources are mostly fiction, that could explain why I'm
getting it backwards. Anyway, thanks for the info.

Oh, one more thing for the ill-informed. David made a typo. That's La
Cosa Nostra. :)

*Pedantic Man strikes again!*

Doc'

.sig Sauer
Message no. 4
From: Robert Watkins <robert.watkins@******.COM>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 13:48:28 +1000
Ratinac writes:
> *Pedantic Man strikes again!*

Ah ha! Your secret is out at last...

--
Duct tape is like the Force: There's a Light side, a Dark side, and it
binds the Universe together.
Robert Watkins -- robert.watkins@******.com
Message no. 5
From: "Ratinac, Rand (NSW)" <RRatinac@*****.REDCROSS.ORG.AU>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 15:49:48 +1000
> Ratinac writes:
> > *Pedantic Man strikes again!*
>
> Ah ha! Your secret is out at last...
> Robert Watkins --
> robert.watkins@******.com
>
>
*Doc staggers back, stunned. "It took you this long to figure it out??"*

Doc'

.sig Sauer
Message no. 6
From: Robert Watkins <robert.watkins@******.COM>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:58:55 +1000
> > Ratinac writes:
> > > *Pedantic Man strikes again!*
> >
> > Ah ha! Your secret is out at last...
> > Robert Watkins -- robert.watkins@******.com

> *Doc staggers back, stunned. "It took you this long to figure it out??"*

No, but only a few days ago you were denying you'd admitted you were male...
or is the above statement only half right?

--
Duct tape is like the Force: There's a Light side, a Dark side, and it
binds the Universe together.
Robert Watkins -- robert.watkins@******.com
Message no. 7
From: "Ratinac, Rand (NSW)" <RRatinac@*****.REDCROSS.ORG.AU>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 16:05:06 +1000
> > > Ratinac writes:
> > > > *Pedantic Man strikes again!*
> > >
> > > Ah ha! Your secret is out at last...
> > > Robert Watkins -- robert.watkins@******.com
>
> > *Doc staggers back, stunned. "It took you this long to figure it
> out??"*
>
> No, but only a few days ago you were denying you'd admitted you were
> male...
> or is the above statement only half right?
> Robert Watkins --
> robert.watkins@******.com
>
Oh. That bit.

*Pedantic Woman scurries into the shadows.*

Doc'

.sig Sauer
Message no. 8
From: Tim Burke <ranger@********.COM.AU>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 20:48:21 +1000
>> No, but only a few days ago you were denying you'd admitted you were
>> male...
>> or is the above statement only half right?
>> Robert Watkins --
>> robert.watkins@******.com
>>
>Oh. That bit.
>
>*Pedantic Woman scurries into the shadows.*
>
>Doc'
>

Well let's put to rest once and for all the notion
of Doc being either Pedantic Man or Pedantic Woman.

The truth is here....

http://home.quicknet.com.au/ranger/rand.gif



Tim Burke
Brisbane, Australia
ranger@********.com.au
#shadowrun: Manx
#950 of 1000

"My karma ran over your dogma."
Message no. 9
From: K in the Shadows <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:19:53 EST
In a message dated 12/22/1998 5:53:19 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
ranger@********.COM.AU writes:

>
> Well let's put to rest once and for all the notion
> of Doc being either Pedantic Man or Pedantic Woman.
>
> The truth is here....
>
> http://home.quicknet.com.au/ranger/rand.gif

Okay, no offense here Doc, but that image quality on that site REALLY bites.
For some reason, I could even find the humor in debating the "Pat-Like"
qualities of it.

Doc, I'd say you still have room to have some fun..

-K
Message no. 10
From: "Ratinac, Rand (NSW)" <RRatinac@*****.REDCROSS.ORG.AU>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 09:26:25 +1000
> >> No, but only a few days ago you were denying you'd admitted you
> were
> >> male...
> >> or is the above statement only half right?
> >> Robert Watkins --
> >> robert.watkins@******.com
> >>
> >Oh. That bit.
> >
> >*Pedantic Woman scurries into the shadows.*
> >
> >Doc'
> >
>
> Well let's put to rest once and for all the notion
> of Doc being either Pedantic Man or Pedantic Woman.
>
> The truth is here....
>
> http://home.quicknet.com.au/ranger/rand.gif
> Tim Burke
>
>
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

No!

You BASTARD!!

That's it!

Where are my loaded dice? Where's Sapphire's character sheet?

Say goodbye, pretty boy!

Bwahahahahah!!!

*This has been an OT rant brought to you in the interests of maintaining
Doc's fading scraps of sanity. We now return you to your regularly
scheduled drivel.*

Doc'

.sig Sauer
Message no. 11
From: "Ratinac, Rand (NSW)" <RRatinac@*****.REDCROSS.ORG.AU>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 09:37:55 +1000
> In a message dated 12/22/1998 5:53:19 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
> ranger@********.COM.AU writes:
> > Well let's put to rest once and for all the notion
> > of Doc being either Pedantic Man or Pedantic Woman.
> >
> > The truth is here....
> >
> > http://home.quicknet.com.au/ranger/rand.gif
>
> Okay, no offense here Doc, but that image quality on that site REALLY
> bites. For some reason, I could even find the humor in debating the
> "Pat-Like" qualities of it.
>
> Doc, I'd say you still have room to have some fun..
>
> -K
>
Okay, that "Pat-Like" remark went WAY over my head. And the reason the
picture sucks is because it was taken by a pretty cruddy digital camera
in a dark computer lab about...oh hell, three or four years back now.

Yeesh.

I look awful.

8-)

And you're still in trouble, Tim.

*Hey, I could still be a transsexual.*

Doc' Androgynous

.sig Sauer
Message no. 12
From: K in the Shadows <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 02:31:48 EST
In a message dated 12/22/1998 5:38:12 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
RRatinac@*****.REDCROSS.ORG.AU writes:

> Okay, that "Pat-Like" remark went WAY over my head. And the reason the
> picture sucks is because it was taken by a pretty cruddy digital camera
> in a dark computer lab about...oh hell, three or four years back now.
>
> Yeesh.
> I look awful.

I won't go there since you did.. :)

> 8-)
> And you're still in trouble, Tim.
> *Hey, I could still be a transsexual.*
> Doc' Androgynous
>
Actually Doc, in so making that last line a statement, you have also answered
the "Pat-like" remark. Pat, as in "Pat" from Saturday Night
Live...the
individual that they couldn't figure out was a man or a woman or both or
neither...

-K

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Underworld (Oi! Steve K and other FASA dudes - pay attention!, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.