From: | shadowrn@*********.com (Chipeloi) |
---|---|
Subject: | Up/DOWNgrading the game |
Date: | Mon May 21 20:00:01 2001 |
The posts i'm referring to are like the chipejack expert driver
Now a lot of ppl say: it to powerful so the Best thing to do is to
downgrade it/ make it harder to get/ put a few disadvantages in it
And i see that with a lot of things also with a few things a hear from
gurth, and then when i ask ok you downgrade that why not balance
the downgrade with a Upgrade for something that is just to
expensive/hard to get/ to much essence ect
The answer most if not all ppl give is : it is in the rules so it "fine"
Now i don't get this you are willing to make something that is in
your opinion to to "good"/ to cheap/ to easy abused harder to get
"downgrade" it and not the other way around
And i'm sure some groups have done that but most ppl who post
gripe about things that are to good /ect
And when we got something like the pocketsec or decks like gurth
says they are way to expensive compared to the comps now
How many ppl would change it in there campaigns not a lot i think...
Why not? wel maybe they don;t want there players to get it to
easy or they just don't want to make the trouble for it i don't know
but i think that if you downgrade something you need to upgrade an
other ...
But as gurth put it: "I'm not downgrading anything i'm trying to
balance it" yes ok nice thought but if i ask to upgrade the overdrive
chips he says :" no way its in the rules so we keep it that way"..
Wel ok this might work but not for me and a lot of ppl do it that way
Now my questions are:
1: does anyone understand what i mean
2: Did anyone get the point?
3: Does anyone have an answer?
--
>If you thought Chipeloi was crazy just wait till you meet me !