Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Dvixen Vidi Vici <dvixen@****.SPYDERNET.COM>
Subject: What going on with the listserve... Was: List limited ???
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 21:40:47 -0700
On Sat, 12 Oct 1996, Pete Sims wrote:

> The distribution of your message dated Fri, 11 Oct 1996 02:21:11 +0100
[snip]

I'm sure everyone is very intimate with this message.
What the listserve is telling you is that the list is locked, due to too
much traffic.

When Listserve Lite is set up, it automatically sets the message per day
limit to 50. It saves any further messages, until the list owner
(mark@******.net) or his deputy, (is there one?) releases the clog. This
can be changed I believe, by the owner of the list. And if it
can't...

Until we know for certain, STOP SENDING THE TEST AND PINGS!!!
They add to the 50 per day limit. (sorry about the yelling, but with a
fifty per day limit, and half of those seem to be pings.....)

:)

(:

Now, if you want to make sure you are still subscribed, send to:

listserv@********.itribe.net

no subject

any of these commands:

confirm *(will confirm that you are still on the list)

info *(this will have the listserve send you a file
of all available commands. very helpful.)

help *(an abbreviated form of the above.)

index *(if by some tragedy, you were off line for a
bit, and didn't get any mail, sending this
will get the listserve to send you an index
of the 'digests' for the list. Warning!
The packets on a high traffic list can be
very big!)

query shadowrn *(The listserve will respond with your
current settings for the shadowrn list.)

set shadowrn nomail *(handy if you want to go away for the
weekend, without unsubbing. to get mail again,
send 'set shadowrn mail')

set shadowrn digest *(sends you one big packet of psts at
irregular intervals.

and, no signature. You'll get a mess back of Unknown command "jump"
(whatever was at the start of each line) Try 'Help'. And you will get
one (each is usually about three or four lines long) for every single
line that starts with a command not recognised by the listserve software.

*puts chalk back on the black board ledge.

<G>

> And if so, does this mean that by the time Steve, Granite and Me have
> finished posting, there'll be no more space for anyone else. What the
> heck is this??? I'm stunned quite frankly.

I'd suggest that until then, everyone be polite and try to limit their
posts, combining into one post, if possible.

> I am going to assume that it's because the list is using unregistered
> Listserve Lite, but I could be wrong. Have we been limited guys and
> gals??? Any ideas. ??

That's a question I think only Mark can answer.
Hey, MARK!
:)

> Pete - the somewhat puzzled manic poster. :)

That's Manic. Capital 'M'.



--
AJ Schaafsma Dvixen@****.spydernet.com
I have a new :) copmuter! No more green screens!!!!!
Message no. 2
From: "Mark A. Imbriaco" <mark@******.NET>
Subject: Re: What going on with the listserve... Was: List limited ???
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 10:36:48 -0400
> When Listserve Lite is set up, it automatically sets the message per day
> limit to 50. It saves any further messages, until the list owner
> (mark@******.net) or his deputy, (is there one?) releases the clog. This
> can be changed I believe, by the owner of the list. And if it
> can't...

This has been changed. It wasn't listed in the docs, so I
(stupidly) assumed that the default was to have no limit.
This has been raised to 500, so unless you guys go really
nuts, we shouldn't have any more problems with it. :-)

> > I am going to assume that it's because the list is using unregistered
> > Listserve Lite, but I could be wrong. Have we been limited guys and
> > gals??? Any ideas. ??
>
> That's a question I think only Mark can answer.
> Hey, MARK!
> :)

The limit was raised. It wasn't because of an unregistered
Listserv-Lite. Listserv-Lite is free as none of the lists
are use to derive a profit and a couple of other limitations.
The problem was do to me making an incorrect assumption.
Somebody Thwap me.

-Mark
Message no. 3
From: A Halliwell <u5a77@**.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: What going on with the listserve... Was: List limited ???
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 00:16:41 +0100
| The limit was raised. It wasn't because of an unregistered
| Listserv-Lite. Listserv-Lite is free as none of the lists
| are use to derive a profit and a couple of other limitations.
| The problem was do to me making an incorrect assumption.
| Somebody Thwap me.

Gladly....
Have a double.....
#######
# # # # # ## #####
# # # # # # # # #
# ###### # # # # # #
# # # # ## # ###### #####
# # # ## ## # # #
# # # # # # # #

#######
# # # # # ## #####
# # # # # # # # #
# ###### # # # # # #
# # # # ## # ###### #####
# # # ## ## # # #
# # # # # # # #

--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@**.keele.ac.uk | |
|Andrew Halliwell | "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!" |
|Principal subjects in:-| "THAT WOULD BE AN ECCLESIASTICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!!|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | - Father Jack in "Father Ted"
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message no. 4
From: Pete Sims <petesims@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: What going on with the listserve... Was: List limited ???
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 04:30:38 +0100
In article <199610151427.KAA14791@**********.itribe.net>, "Mark A.
Imbriaco" <mark@******.NET> writes

At the risk of being accused of arrogance and accusatory savagery
But you did ask for it :)

> The limit was raised. It wasn't because of an unregistered
> Listserv-Lite. Listserv-Lite is free as none of the lists
> are use to derive a profit and a couple of other limitations.
> The problem was do to me making an incorrect assumption.
> Somebody Thwap me.

>
> th
> thwa
> thwapth <---1000 YEAR OLD CARP
> thwapthwa
> thwapthwapth
> thwapthwapthwa
> thwapthwapthwapt
> thwapthwapthwapthw
> thwapthwapthwapthwapt
> thwapthwapth thwapthw
> thwapthwpath wapthwap
> thwapthwapthwa wapthwapth
> thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwa
> (thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwap)
> thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapth
> thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthw
> thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthw
> apthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapt
> ththwpthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwthwap
> apthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwap
> thwapthwapth thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwa hwapthwapth
> thwapthw thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthw thwapthwap
> thwap thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthw thwap
> thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwapt
> thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapthwa
> thwapthwapthwapthwapthwapth
> thwapthwapthwapthwapthwa
> thwapthwapthwapthwapth
> thwapthwapthwapthwap
> thwapthwapthwapth
> thwapthwapthwpt
> thwapthwapthw
> thwapthwapt
> thwapthwa
> thwapth
> thwap
> thw
> thwap
> thwapth
> thwapthwap
> thwapthwapth
> thwapthwapthwap
> thwapthwapthwapth
> thwapthwapthwapthwa
> thwapthwapthwapthwapt
> thwapth thwapthw
> thwapt thwapth
> thwa thwa
> thw thw
> th th
>
>

Pete, (the humble poster)

<grin>

--
Pete Sims
Heroes or Fools? That's a determination others will make in hindsight. But by
being here now, we make that determination for ourselves, and it's neither.
Lt.Col.T.C.McQueen

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about What going on with the listserve... Was: List limited ???, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.