Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Mercenary X <kdye@*****.STANFORD.EDU>
Subject: You were right
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 1994 16:34:27 -0700
I went out and traded my Palladium book for Edge of the Sword: 1, you
were right, this one is better. But it does not have shadowrun
conversion tables.

MercenaryX
Message no. 2
From: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@***.NEU.EDU>
Subject: Re: You were right
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 1994 21:03:14 -0400
>>>>> "Mercenary" == Mercenary X <kdye@*****.STANFORD.EDU>
writes:

Mercenary> I went out and traded my Palladium book for Edge of the Sword:
Mercenary> 1, you were right, this one is better. But it does not have
Mercenary> shadowrun conversion tables.

Nobody has Shadowrun conversion tables; FASA wouldn't give permission, from
what I hear. But you can use that formula Ivy posted last week to get some
reasonable results:

((Bullet weight in grains) x Bullet speed in feet per second) / 45,000) +
3 will equal the Force. Round normally, and the final +3 corrects for SRII.
Adjust Damage Code as appropriate for the weapon.

The problem is that you /can't/ really use a single basic formula for all
of Shadowrun's weapons because there isn't one. The guys at FASA know
almost nothing about firearms; everything in their books is based on the
"it looks good enough to us" philosophy. Look at the first edition, for
example. So you're left with too choices: pick appropriate values based on
existing weapons, or rewrite every single firearm.

--
Rat <ratinox@***.neu.edu> | fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ratinox | fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord fnord
this space intentionally left blank | fnord fnord fnord

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about You were right, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.