Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Jai Tao <jdfalk@****.COM>
Subject: A cookie Recipie (non-SR)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 1994 01:09:52 -0500
Forwarded by request. (You'll see why below.)

----------

My daughter & I had just finished a salad at Neiman-Marcus Cafe in
Dallas & decided to have a small dessert. Because our family are such
cookie lovers, we decided to try the "Neiman-Marcus Cookie". It was so
excellent that I asked if they would give me the recipe and they said
with a small frown, "I'm afraid not." Well, I said, would you let me
buy the recipe? With a cute smile, she said, "Yes." I asked how much,
and she responded, "Two fifty." I said with approval, just add it to my
tab.

Thirty days later, I received my VISA statement from Neiman-Marcus
and it was $285.00. I looked again and I remembered I had only spent
$9.95 for two salads and about $20.00 for a scarf. As I glanced at the
bottom of the statement, it said, "Cookie Recipe - $250.00." Boy, was
I upset!! I called Neiman's Accounting Dept. and told them the
waitress said it was "two fifty," and I did not realize she meant
$250.00 for a cookie recipe. I asked them to take back the recipe and
reduce my bill and they said they were sorry, but because all the
recipes were this expensive (so not just everyone could duplicate any of our
bakery recipes... ) the bill would stand. I waited, thinking of how I
could get even or even try and get any of my money back.

I just said, "Okay, you folks got my $250.00 and now I'm going to have
$250.00 worth of fun." I told her that I was going to see to it that
every cookie lover will have a $250.00 cookie recipe from Neiman-Marcus
for nothing. She replied, "I wish you wouldn't do this." I said, "I'm
sorry but this is the only way I feel I could get even," and I will.

So, here it is, and please pass it to someone else or run a few
copies... I paid for it; now you can have it for free. (Recipe may be
halved.):

2 cups butter 4 cups flour
2 tsp. soda 2 cups sugar
5 cups blended oatmeal** 24 oz. chocolate chips
2 cups brown sugar 1 tsp. salt
1 8 oz. Hershey Bar (grated) 4 eggs
2 tsp. baking powder 3 cups chopped nuts
2 tsp. vanilla (your choice)

Cream the butter and both sugars.
Add eggs and vanilla; mix together with flour, oatmeal, salt,
baking powder, and soda.
Add chocolate chips, Hershey Bar and nuts.
Roll into balls and place two inches apart on a cookie sheet.
Bake for 10 minutes at 375 degrees. Makes 112 cookies.

** measure oatmeal and blend in a blender to a fine powder.

Have fun!!! This is not a joke --- this is a true story..
************************************************************
That's it. Please, pass it along to everyone you know, single
people, mailing lists, etc.....


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Internet: buttercup@***********.cts.com feberke@******.vassar.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"If you know what you want then you go and you find it and you get it"
-Into The Woods
Message no. 2
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@*******.MANKATO.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: A cookie Recipie (non-SR)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 1994 02:39:40 -0600
An urban legend
Not true
irrelevant
seen it a dozen times

____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@*******.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Political Correctness is
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> P.C. for "Thought Police"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
Message no. 3
From: Matt <mosbun@******.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
Subject: Re: A cookie Recipie (non-SR)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 1994 10:04:57 -0500
This crock has been floating around the Purdue net for a few days now. I
didn't figure I'd have to worry about it here, though.
Don't worry, the entire story is, predictably, false. It appeared in Ann
Landers some time ago, who blew the whistle on it. It's not a get-rich-quick
scam, it's just annoying.

Matt
Message no. 4
From: Jai Tao <jdfalk@****.COM>
Subject: Re: A cookie Recipie (non-SR)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 1994 21:12:23 -0500
On Sat, 2 Apr 1994, Matt wrote:

> This crock has been floating around the Purdue net for a few days now. I
> didn't figure I'd have to worry about it here, though.
> Don't worry, the entire story is, predictably, false. It appeared in Ann
> Landers some time ago, who blew the whistle on it. It's not a get-rich-quick
> scam, it's just annoying.

In that case, I apologize. I thought it was real.

"I may be as bad as the worst /-----------------\
but, thank God, | Jai Tao |
I am as good as the best." | jdfalk@****.com |
-Walt Whitman \-----------------/
Message no. 5
From: "C. Paul Douglas" <granite@*****.NET>
Subject: Re: A cookie Recipie (non-SR)
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 1994 00:05:28 -0500
On Sat, 2 Apr 1994, Robert A. Hayden wrote:

> An urban legend

Posotively..Legends are often based in fact...

> Not true

This is not able to be proven...

> irrelevant

More than likely..

> seen it a dozen times

Of this there is no doubt..
I recall an OLD news story that hade something to do with the NM cookie
story but naturally I am unable to remember the details..However, I did
at one point attempt to verify this story last year..I will spare you all
the details..I ended up calling all of the NM locations in Dallas and as
I had recalled they all have Eateries in them of one sort or another, and
at least one of them has a full fledged Bakery..And since industrial
recipes are indeed expensive..There remains a possibility that it is
indeed true....However it is overrated - My wife made the cookies - I was
not impressed.
-------------------------GRANITE
Message no. 6
From: Joe Bay <bay@*******.RUTGERS.EDU>
Subject: Re: A cookie Recipie (non-SR)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 1994 00:25:22 EDT
I think it was pretty cool, the recipe, the message, everything. GAH.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about A cookie Recipie (non-SR), you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.