Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Thanatos sthanatos@****.geocities.com
Subject: Adept Handybook 1.0 Follow-up. More Needed!
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 22:27:19 -0400
Greetings and salutations to all you beautiful people!

This is Hobbis (by way of Thanatos), maintainer of the (formerly Physical)
Adept Handybook. Recently, I asked Thanatos to send a message to the list
asking for fresh submissions. True friend and compatriot he is, the
message was sent and I have, indeed, received some response to it.
However, I would like to encourage anyone who is interested to send not
only powers, but also house rules, articles and the like. Some of you out
there doubtless still have some pent-up opinions on the classic Adept vs.
Sammie argument; write an article!* (We could even get a
point-counterpoint thing going on...) Some of you (or your GMs) have house
rules that you think make the adept rules better; let everyone else benefit
from them! Yes, the Handybook will continue to be a centralized source for
plenty-o-powers, but it can be much more than that with your help.
As mentioned in the previous message, please direct all responses to
brbrown@******.edu. Full credit will be given to all submissions, so (get
ready...this part's pretty cliche) what are you waiting for?

Thank you.

-Brett


* This is not an excuse to start another adept vs. sammie flame war, so
please don't go there. If you want to debate, just do it in the Handybook
and not the list. :-)
brbrown@******.edu "My soul, do not seek immortal life,
ICQ# 11772854 but exhaust the realm of the possible."
http://students.vassar.edu/~brbrown/ -Pindar
Info-Tech Editor, The Miscellany News

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Adept Handybook 1.0 Follow-up. More Needed!, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.