Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Mark A. Imbriaco" <mark@******.NET>
Subject: [ADMIN] Off-Topic Posts.
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 13:38:42 -0500
Alright. That's it. I've had enough. I will not tolerate excessive
off-topic discussions on this list any longer. Members will be given one
warning to bring the discussion on-topic, after which I give Fro a free
hand to summarily unsubscribe users. Our signal/noise ratio is out of
control, and until it gets back in line, I'm going to be a dictator about
it.

-Mark
Message no. 2
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Off-Topic Posts.
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 12:10:49 -0700
Mark A. Imbriaco wrote:
|
| Alright. That's it. I've had enough. I will not tolerate excessive
| off-topic discussions on this list any longer. Members will be given one
| warning to bring the discussion on-topic, after which I give Fro a free
| hand to summarily unsubscribe users. Our signal/noise ratio is out of
| control, and until it gets back in line, I'm going to be a dictator about
| it.

Just to clear up one point: Heed warnings from Mark Imbriaco, Dvixen
and Fro.

-David
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm
--
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing
which ones to keep."
Message no. 3
From: Adam J adamj@*********.html.com
Subject: [ADMIN] Off Topic Posts
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 02:34:25 -0700
I know it's weekend and all that, but there were Wayyy too many off topic
posts today. Reign it in a bit, please.

(And thanks to Jon Szeto and Tinner for the only on topic posts I saw ;-)

-Adam
Who's Uncle Len owns a chippy in Wales.
--
< http://shadowrun.html.com/tss / adamj@*********.html.com >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader / TSA Co-Admin / ICQ# 2350330 >
< FreeRPG & Shadowrun Webring Co-Admin / The Shadowrun Supplemental >
< ShadowFAQ: http://shadowrun.html.com/shadowfaq >
< "She pretty much walks around perpetually pissed at Mick." >
< - Kevin Kelly, on professional wrestler Mick Foleys wife Colleen >
Message no. 4
From: Scott Wheelock iscottw@*****.nb.ca
Subject: [ADMIN] Off Topic Posts
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 07:11:48 -0400
"And now, a Channel 6 editorial reply to Adam J."
] I know it's weekend and all that, but there were Wayyy too many off topic
] posts today. Reign it in a bit, please.

Whoa...how long have we been back On Topic? I must
have missed the announcement...

Scott
Message no. 5
From: Mark A. Imbriaco mark.imbriaco@*****.com
Subject: [ADMIN] Off Topic Posts
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:19:06 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Scott Wheelock wrote:

> "And now, a Channel 6 editorial reply to Adam J."
> ] I know it's weekend and all that, but there were Wayyy too many off topic
> ] posts today. Reign it in a bit, please.
>
> Whoa...how long have we been back On Topic? I must
> have missed the announcement...

We've been back on-topic ever since the lists at iTRiBE went away.

-Mark
Message no. 6
From: Jett zmjett@*********.com
Subject: [ADMIN] Off Topic Posts
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 03:30:32 -0500
Adam J wrote:

> I know it's weekend and all that, but there were Wayyy too many off topic
> posts today. Reign it in a bit, please.
>
> (And thanks to Jon Szeto and Tinner for the only on topic posts I saw ;-)

I find it ironic that the post griping about OT posts created more responses
than the OT posts themselves. ;)


--Jett, adding to the mayhem.
<*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*><*>


If you're happy and you know it see a shrink.

Rape and pillage BEFORE you burn! BEFORE!

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [ADMIN] Off Topic Posts, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!