Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: adamj@*********.com (Adam Jury)
Subject: [ADMIN] RE: running shadows at DragonCon?
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 11:17:04 -0600
At 11:09 9/3/2002, Derek Hyde wrote:

>ACK GAG PUKE BARF!!!!!! Oh damn dude how can you say that 3rd ed D&D
>is better than 2nd ed? That's just wrong....they may have made a couple
>things better but they ruined a hell of a lot more than what they
>fixed....
>
>And yes, WOTC need to be put down like a dog with rabies....their job of
>ruining so many games just so they can go dipping their glasses in all
>the different flavors of kool-aid is just friggin disgusting.....

This post is off-topic and complete flamebait. If you want to debate AD&D
2nd Edition vs D&D 3rd Edition, there are mailing lists and forums where it
would be acceptable. If you wish to discuss the state of the industry and
WotC's influence on it, there are mailing lists and forums where it would
be acceptable.

Unless it can be made relevant to Shadowrun, D&D/WotC/d20 should not be
discussed, especially in this manner.

Adam
Assistant Fearless Leader
--
| Editor, The Shadowrun Supplemental: http://tss.dumpshock.com |
| adamj@*********.com | http://www.talkinabout.com | UIN: 2350330 |
Message no. 2
From: dmhyde@***.net (Derek Hyde)
Subject: [ADMIN] RE: running shadows at DragonCon?
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:52:05 -0500
> This post is off-topic and complete flamebait.

My apologies Adam, I won't do it again.....

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about [ADMIN] RE: running shadows at DragonCon?, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.