Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Simon Fuller sfuller@******.com.au
Subject: ADMIN smash puny thread
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 09:45:24 +1100
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Imbriaco <mark.imbriaco@*****.com>
To: 'shadowrn@*********.com' <shadowrn@*********.com>
Date: Thursday, March 02, 2000 1:22 AM
Subject: [ADMIN] RE: insiders: cannon companion due?


>On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Lee Decker wrote:
>
>> <SNIP Abortion's comments>
>> Not that I totally agree here, but ae has a point. Lately anytime we
critize
>> fasa, we get jumped on and the thread
>> squashed. I know alot of the old timers now contribute to FASA, but that
>> doesn't make our arguments not valid. We aren't
>> critizing you or anyone in particular, we're just stating our opinions.
If
>> the list can't deal with that, well hell I've
>> been meaning to leave for quite some time.
>
>The admins of the list don't have any problem with anyone's point of view,
>at least not in their capacity as admins. I may personally think you're
>full of shit, but that's not a good enough reason to squash a
>thread. THIS thread however has been moving steadily toward a flamewar
>for a while no, so I think it's time to call it quits.
>
>This thread is closed.
>
>-Mark
>
Good job, too. (I posted a message to that thread before I realised just how
many there were already and how nasty they were turning) I really don't need
nearly a hundred different messages saying that somebody else is wrong.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about ADMIN smash puny thread, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.