Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: rjmsouthard@*****.com (Richard Southard)
Subject: A few answers regarding SR4 - Deckers
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 06:55:17 -0500
In my group I was the only person who really liked Deckers. I actually
liked a complicated system, or maybe I should say "larger rules base". The
others in my group really liked having me around but had no real Idea what
they heck I was doing. I have always imagined it would be like that for the
SR characters. Or to quote from one gaming session, "Less
techno-garbage-talk and more doing what the frag you do deckboy!"

That being said, I recognized the problem with deckers. I was not about to
make my group sit around and wait. My GM and I dealt with it a different
way. First off my decker was a combat decker, so he always went along.
Second I created the matrix systems for my GM. He would give me some
direction and then he would give final design approval. It can be done if
everyone plays fair. Then before the gaming session my GM and I would run
the system. Usually I would end up with a file named Paydata. Then during
the normal gaming session when it came time to jack in, my GM would hand me
a paper with the file contents on it. (Assuming I had been successful) No
muss no fuss.... and no waiting.

It worked well for us. It may seem like cheating with me designing the
system and then running against it, but only if you forget to roleplay.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.7 - Release Date: 4/12/2005

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about A few answers regarding SR4 - Deckers, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.