Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: loneeagle@********.co.uk (Lone Eagle)
Subject: Allies and Aspected Magicians
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:22:56 +0000
All Ally spirits are created with a sorcery skill equal to that of their
summoner according to MitS.
What happens then when an Aspected conjurer summons an Ally?


--
Lone Eagle
"Hold up lads, I got an idea."

www.wyrmtalk.co.uk - Please be patient, this site is under construction

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d++(---) s++: a->? C++(+) US++ P! L E? W++ N o? K? w+ O! M- V? PS+ PE-()
Y PGP? t+@ 5++ X- R+>+++$>* tv b+++ DI++++ D+ G++ e+ h r* y+>+++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

GCC0.2: y75>?.uk[NN] G87 S@:@@[SR] B+++ f+ RM(RR) rm++ rr++ l++(--) m- w
s+(+++) GM+++(-) A GS+(-) h++ LA+++ CG--- F c+
Message no. 2
From: gurth@******.nl (Gurth)
Subject: Allies and Aspected Magicians
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:44:42 +0100
According to Lone Eagle, on Thursday 25 March 2004 23:22 the word on the
street was...

> All Ally spirits are created with a sorcery skill equal to that of their
> summoner according to MitS.
> What happens then when an Aspected conjurer summons an Ally?

Since an aspected conjurer has no Sorcery skill, I would assume this means
the ally also won't have it. This perfectly follows the rules in MITS,
anyway :)

--
Gurth@******.nl - Stone Age: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Those who ignore history are doomed to keep liking crappy dance
covers of great songs.
-> Probably NAGEE Editor * ShadowRN GridSec * Triangle Virtuoso <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://plastic.dumpshock.com <-

GC3.12: GAT/! d- s:- !a>? C++(---) UL+ P(+) L++ E W--(++) N o? K w(--)
O V? PS+ PE@ Y PGP- t- 5++ X(+) R+++$ tv+(++) b++@ DI- D+ G+ e h! !r y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Allies and Aspected Magicians, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.

Thwap!