Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Gian-Paolo Musumeci <musumeci@***.LIS.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: An apology/explanation
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 12:36:55 -0500
Sorry for maybe coming across as flaming Tim Skirvin.

Anyone who wants an explanation, send me private email.
Message no. 2
From: Doctor Doom <jch8169@*******.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: An apology/explanation
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 13:49:05 -0500
> Sorry for maybe coming across as flaming Tim Skirvin.
>
> Anyone who wants an explanation, send me private email.

Herr Musumeci:

I would be most pleased to hear any explanation you may care to offer, as I
was just preparing to smite you for petty flaming. This sort of diatribe is
NOT acceptable.

Further, if you two gentlemen intend for your discussion to become of a
personal nature, TAKE IT TO PRIVATE E-MAIL!!!

________________ _______ _______ ____ ____
\ _____ \ / \ / \ / \/ \ >>> Attack,
\ | | | |---___ | ___---| | || || | attack, and
| | | | |_____/ | \_____| | || || | if in doubt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | | | | | | || || | ATTACK! <<<
"Iron hand in a | |___/ / \_______/ \_______/|____| |____| -=-=-=-=-=-
velvet glove." | / ||
-- Charles V |_______/ Dread Executor of Administrative Tasks for Hayden

^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^
Message no. 3
From: Tim Skirvin <tskirvin@********.UNI.UIUC.EDU>
Subject: Re: An apology/explanation
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 17:58:28 -0500
> Sorry for maybe coming across as flaming Tim Skirvin.

MAYBE flaming?

What would you call it BESIDES that?

> Anyone who wants an explanation, send me private email.

And not me...I don't know what he's talking about...

-------------Tim Skirvin (tskirvin@********.uni.uiuc.edu-------------
"He's NOT a gibbering idiot - he's cured of gibbering, he's just an
idiot now." -- Jane, "Waiting for God"

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about An apology/explanation, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.