Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: Aristotle antithesis@**********.com
Subject: Astral Adepts (Steve K, please pay attention) (was Re:
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 00:27:43 -0400
>>>Simon and Fiona wrote:
[ Speaking of Adepts and Astral, why isn't there an Astral Adept <snip> ]

>>>Doc Replied:
[ As to why they've apparently been dropped (I don't REMEMBER seeing rules
for them in MitS), you'd have to ask Steve Kenson, or someone like that.
Maybe it was for as simple a reason as the name Astral Adept was no longer
allowable <snip> ]


I've given thought to making psionics a full fledged "path" in my game.
Their might be some options (like those for full mages in MiTS) for the
full mages, and it would have it's conjurer and sorcerer style aspected
mages. The reason I bring it up now is because I was thinking of using the
"astral adept" (able to astrally percieve and project) as the other form of
aspected mage in the path (the path's answer to shamanists and elemenatalists).

Thanks,
Aristotle.

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Astral Adepts (Steve K, please pay attention) (was Re:, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.