Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: "Mike Mulvihill (FASA)" <FASAMike@***.COM>
Subject: Authors and stuff
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 17:48:01 -0500
Droopy wrote on Mon, Nov 18, 1996 2:04 AM EDT

>> Herein lies the true problem. Just because Dowd (when he was alive)
>> seemed to be the nexus regarding magic in SR (Hume was IMO), any
>
>I must concur, Paul is the magic daddy as well as father of the
>current matrix rules.
>
>BTW, Mike? Do you guys still keep in touch with Paul? I haven't
>seen him in ages.

Paul no longer associates with FASA. I met him at a SR planning meeting we
had before I took over the SR line. He's a real nice guy.

>> Either that, or all who assume it was an 'honest omission' believe FASA
>> perpetuates Blaring Obvious omissions from its sourcebooks.
>
>FASA make mistakes? Nope, couldn't be that. <G>

Mistakes? In our products? Hey, they didn't tell me about that when I took
over the job? <VBG>

>Tom died? When did this happen?

I answered this one. And Tom (reading over my shoulder now) is now laughing.

Have Fun!
Play Games!
Tom Lives!!!!

Mike Mulvihill
Shadowrun Line Developer
FASA
See our web page at www.fasa.com
Message no. 2
From: Brian W Allison <ballison@*******.WAM.UMD.EDU>
Subject: Re: Authors and stuff
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 20:46:24 -0500
> >Tom died? When did this happen?
>
> I answered this one. And Tom (reading over my shoulder now) is now laughing.


Well glad I made *somebody* laugh today. :)

At me, with me.... irrelevant....




Brian W. Allison

Computer Scientist Vocalist Would-be Poet Bicycler Scuba Diver
Hacker(0xca) Nerd(79) GenX(21) #include <witticism.h>
http://www.wam.umd.edu/~ballison

--- Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail is not welcome at this account ---
--- and will result in a US$500 fee per US Code Title 47 Sec 227. ---

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Authors and stuff, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.