Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

Message no. 1
From: What's this button do? <GRAFF85@********.CORTLAND.EDU>
Subject: Autoexec Program and System load wrt SRII
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 12:34:45 -0400
My brother asked me to post this little tid-bit:

1) In VR there is what is called an autoexec needed for frames is this still
needed?

2) SRII cybercombat rules supersede those in VR so does system load discussed
in VR still count?

--Dave
----v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^-
David Graff | GEEK CODE v1.0.1
339 Randall Hall | GS(CS)@ d+(---) p(-p+) c+(+++) l u- e* m---(*) s !n(n---)
Cortland, Ny 13045| h* f+(--) g++ w+++ t++(---) r(++) y+
607.753.2783 |
--------------------------------------------------------Phlatline-------------
Love is only true when it cuts as you leave the person you have come to know
almost as well as yourself.
Message no. 2
From: A cohort's CoHort <cohort@******.CONNECTED.COM>
Subject: Re: Autoexec Program and System load wrt SRII
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 13:48:14 -0800
On Thu, 17 Feb 1994, What's this button do? wrote:
> 1) In VR there is what is called an autoexec needed for frames is this still
> needed?
>
dunno.
> 2) SRII cybercombat rules supersede those in VR so does system load discussed
> in VR still count?
>
In the back of SRII, there is a listing of new rules for the sourcebooks.
Read through there, first, then through the SRII matrix rules, and see if you
can find something that supercedes that mentioned. If you can't,
everything's the same.

CoHort@******.connected.com | Overheard at a bridge table:
@******* Genesis | "So, do you know the value of notrump?"
(jericho.connected.com 4040) | "Yeah, it should be just a bit larger than
(Stellar down due to TD :( ) | your shoulders."
Message no. 3
From: What's this button do? <GRAFF85@********.CORTLAND.EDU>
Subject: Re: Autoexec Program and System load wrt SRII
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 17:46:25 -0400
>> 2) SRII cybercombat rules supersede those in VR so does system load discussed
>> in VR still count?
>>
>In the back of SRII, there is a listing of new rules for the sourcebooks.
>Read through there, first, then through the SRII matrix rules, and see if you
>can find something that supercedes that mentioned. If you can't,
>everything's the same.

ok well it says that the SRII rules supersede anything in VR but no mention of
system load....where should I go with this one...my bro brought this one up to
me and it seemed that if this was eliminated VR is totally obsolete in it's
load, and total combat scene...looks like my bro and I are going to be munchkin
killing!!!

--Dave
----v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^---v^-
David Graff | GEEK CODE v1.0.1
339 Randall Hall | GS(CS)@ d+(---) p(-p+) c+(+++) l u- e* m---(*) s !n(n---)
Cortland, Ny 13045| h* f+(--) g++ w+++ t++(---) r(++) y+
607.753.2783 |
--------------------------------------------------------Phlatline-------------
Love is only true when it cuts as you leave the person you have come to know
almost as well as yourself.
Message no. 4
From: "Jason Carter, Nightstalker" <CARTER@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: Autoexec Program and System load wrt SRII
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 17:53:59 -0800
On Thu, 17 Feb 1994, What's this button do? wrote:
> 1) In VR there is what is called an autoexec needed for frames is this still
> needed?

Yes. Use the rules in VR when dealing with frames unless they directly
contradict those in SRII.

> 2) SRII cybercombat rules supersede those in VR so does system load discussed
> in VR still count?

Yes. Remember that SRII supersedes only where the two are in conflict. System
load is never mentioned in SRII so there can be no conflict.

===============================================================================
See Ya in Shadows, "Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer."
Jason J Carter -- Deep Throat, The X-Files
The Nightstalker Carter@***.EDU

Further Reading

If you enjoyed reading about Autoexec Program and System load wrt SRII, you may also be interested in:

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.